Hi, the more important question for me is, how (if?) i can select an entire survey structure(containing scraps, maps etc), and specify that i want a specific map to be offset. Your main conclusion was correct, i want to print all maps, without explicitely specifying them, and at the same time offset some maps thereof. I want to „select all“, „offset 1234-map“ and optionally completely hide „456-map“ (or alternatively its survey)
> Am 18.12.2021 um 15:38 schrieb Stacho Mudrak <[email protected]>: > > > Hi Beni, > > first, I am sorry for the late answer. > > Do I understand you correctly, that you want to mix "select survey" and > "unselect/offset particular map"? To be able to export all maps from a given > survey without the need of specification of the master map for this survey. > Am I right? > > Select survey and unselect survey seems to work for me. But unselect map is > missing/not working, neither combination of map/survey select/unselect. > Normally - if map selection for a given projection is available, it is used. > If not, survey selection is used. > > I think, unselecting/offsetting maps from survey selection is feasible > without any negative side effects. I am just not sure, how much work would it > be to implement it. > > S. > > > >> On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 at 10:37, Benedikt Hallinger <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello, >> I currently experiment with creating a nice overview map of a fairly >> complex part of the Hirlatz cave. The dataset spans about 8km in passage >> lengths in variuous levels with lots of over-/underlaying passages. >> The data is organised in surveys, where each survey defines at least a >> "Hauptmap" wich usually includes all the submaps the main map is >> composed of. The main intend of the "Hauptmap" is to nicely render the >> survey alone. >> >> Now I want to create an overview map and using the select statement I >> can easily instruct therion to suck in and render all the maps of the >> entire region. Offsets are stripped this way, but therion does a very >> nice job in sorting te maps according to the altitude, which eases my >> brain very much, since i don't need to wrap my head around sorting 54 >> maps by hand. Therion does a splendid job with this already. >> >> However this produces one problem for me: I cannot render map offsets >> easily anymore. >> So what I had to do is to select the entire region using "select >> Wandaugenlabyrinth.Hirlatzhoehle" and render that. >> This will print the processes maps into the therion.log file. >> From there I have picket it up to create a new "map" structure (`grep ^M >> therion.og |sort -r | awk '{print $3}'`). >> This i added to the thconfig file and selected that instead. There it is >> now easy to define offets again. >> >> BUT: This introduces another, long term problem: >> When sometimes in the future someone adds a new survey to this region, >> he needs to remember to merge its maps also into the overview map >> definition (at the correct position because of altitude!). >> >> >> >> Thus, it would be cool if we had some kind of "offset" thconfig command >> alongside the select one. >> This would allow me to read in the entire regions maps, and just specify >> offsets for the offset ones; something like this: >> >> ----- thconfig ----- >> source ../../therion/Hirlatzhoehle.th >> select Wandaugenlabyrinth.Hirlatzhoehle # read in all defined maps of >> the Region >> >> offset [email protected] [20 15 m] >> below >> offset [email protected] [-30 -20 >> m] above >> -------------------- >> >> Expected result would be all the maps read and printed at their altitude >> level, but the two maps offset as already known from the "map" command. >> If someone adds, lets say, >> [email protected] and recompiles the >> file, the new survey would be included *without specifying it >> explicitely*. >> >> >> Is such a command possible? >> I know it's not such a big deal with smaller caves, but in my dataset >> this would save a tremendous ammount of time down the road when I will >> make the atlas of Hirlatz regions (not to mention a big overview map). >> >> >> ps. and probably relatet: When I give "select >> Wandaugenlabyrinth.Hirlatzhoehle" and then "unselect >> [email protected]", 177 survey is still >> printed to the map. I would had expected that the scraps of the map >> would be hidden from output. >> >> >> Kind regards, >> Beni >> _______________________________________________ >> Therion mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion > _______________________________________________ > Therion mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
_______________________________________________ Therion mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
