Hi all
Not strictly a Therion question, but the answer is likely to be in the
data entry or the interpretation of data in Therion.
I'm slowly incorporating QGIS into my workflow, and trying to automate it.
As such I'm using a modified version of the survex 3d importer
https://github.com/AndrewAkinson/qgis3-survex-import_amend
So that items can be easily switched on and off I'm going down the line
of importing the 3d files by cave rather than the generated one for the
whole catchment
For now I'm doing it with the data in
http://www.cave-registry.org.uk/svn/CheddarCatchment/
Currently I'm working on the Longwood Valley area as Longwood Valley
Sink has been recently discovered.
The directories I'm using
RRift/ (3d needs to be generated from survex)
LongwoodValleySink/
Longwood/ (Fake data with calibrate compass -90!)
Toothache/ (single leg)
In each of these directories the .th file generates a survex 3d file
Also in the the root there is a LongwoodValley.thcfg which has the above
caves (plus maybe Charterhouse, GB, TynningsGS and Reads depending on
how I left it)
In the diagram attached (hopefully this list does attachments!)
The Dark purple dots are the import of the 3d file that has Rhino,
Longwood, LongwoodValley Sink and Toothache together. The light pink,
yellow dots are the individual imports (and entrances from the MCRA
database.) Also included is an overlay of a scree shot from aven, which
agrees with the group import.
The question is why is Longwood different when imported as a 3d on its
own compared with as a group? They are both using the same data!
Andrew
_______________________________________________
Therion mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
