I agree Shag. I think it's too soon for another Trek series. But at
least it looks like Berman is out of the mix, which can only be seen
as a good thing.



On Mar 24, 10:51 pm, "Shag" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The only good thing about this is the following quote, "... a Hollywood
> writer is looking to produce a new TV show to tie in with the upcoming
> movie."
>
> That mean he doesn't have any funding or the support of Paramount.  Thank
> goodness.  The TV series needs to stay off the air for a while longer.
>
> The Irredeemable 
> Shaghttp://onceuponageek.comhttp://firestormfan.comhttp://twitter.com/onceuponageek
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>
> On Behalf Of Edward Crosby
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 12:58 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [The Unique Geek] Star Trek returing to television?
>
> This is ludicrous.http://www.imdb.com/news/ni0718957/
>
> I love Bryan Fuller's work but to bring another Star Trek show to TV is
> pushing it. After the new movie, the first time anyone should be thinking
> about television should be after, at least, a 10 year rest.
> For me, since Deep Space Nine entered it's fourth season, I've been burned
> out on Star Trek. I tried getting into Voyager, but it, pretty much,
> turned to crap after the second season. I tried Enterprise and was
> instantly disgusted after hearing that stupid ass theme song.
>
> --
>
> Have a Better One,
> Edward Crosbyhttp://www.edwardcrosby.comhttp://www.techdiffpodcast.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Unique Geek" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to