I did like the original, but don't have anyone to see it with (Maria has
given it a hearty NO). The trailer did look promising, but someone needs to
let directors know that shooting trailer-only footage is not cool. The
missing scene show in the Iron Man 2 trailer was better than what was
included in the film!

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Ronald Methvin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Short plot synopsis: The Predators abduct a bunch of soldiers, mercenaries,
> gang members, killers, etc. and bring them to a hunting planet for good time
> huntin' funzies.  Yep, that’s about it.  I kind of think the Predators are
> the rednecks of the universe. And, yes, the Predators even have a little bit
> of racism against differnt' lookin' Predators in the movie, too.
>
>
>
> Anyway, they really got back to the original Predator(s) verses soldiers
> concept, but this time, instead of the humans being from the same group,
> none of them know each other; so, there is that new dynamic thrown in. The
> movie definitely succeeds in what it was trying to accomplish.  They even
> did a good job with having the appropriate amount of ‘WTF?!” that the
> characters would have without it being just a rehash of the original.  I
> wasn’t sure I would go for Adrian Brody as a tough guy, but he actually does
> a pretty good job.  Danny Trejo (super tattooed Mexican guy that is in all
> of the director’s, Robert Rodriguez’s, movies is good as always), and the
> trailer for their movie featuring him, Machete, is AWESOME.
>
>
>
> There were even some twists (for people who hadn’t read casting and
> character bio announcements a year ago, grrr) that were handled pretty well.
> The special effects were top notch, as well.  They have some other alien
> wildlife on the planet that some had to be CGI just because Earth creatures
> don’t move that way and animatronics wouldn’t work, but all totally more
> realistic than anything in Avatar.  I’m 99% sure other parts we
> animatronics because they looked so ‘real’, but I couldn’t really ‘tell’
> when things were CGI or physical.  Hollywood, take note – Stan Winston’s
> shop is the best!
>
>
>
> The only complaint I have is that a scene from the trailers is actually
> totally different in the movie.  I don’t mean like in Iron Man 2, where
> Tony just jumps out of the plane rather than, how in the trailer, Pepper
> kisses the helmet and throws it out.  No, this is actually something that
> kind of matters to the plot.  I don’t consider this a spoiler, but
> instead, a ‘ignore the trailer’ thing, but here is some space incase you
> feel differently:
>
>
>
> .
>
> .
>
> .
>
> .
>
> .
>
> .
>
> .
>
> ..
>
> .
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The part in the trailer that shows Adrian with more than a dozen triple
> laser dots on him – never happens in the movie.  Don’t be waiting for it.
> Rodriguez was even asked specifically about this, and he basically said
> that movies often film stuff just for the trailers early on, not necessarily
> to show what happens in the movie, but to show what the audience should
> expect concept-wise.  I’m totally ok with that – if the scene doesn’t
> actually matter.  But in this case, it actually impacts the plot and
> story, or at least impacts what you are waiting to happen in the movie.  I
> think it is a total bait and switch.  Yeah, sometimes adjustments are made
> to the story later on, but, without going into any detail, they had to have
> known that scene wouldn’t work that way real early on.  Meh.
>
>
>
> .
>
> .
>
> .
>
> ..
>
> .
>
> .
>
> .
>
> .
>
> .
>
> .
>
> .
>
> .
>
> .
>
>
>
> .
>
>
>
> .
>
>
>
> In closing, the movie was the best treatment of Predators since the
> original, and if you liked the original, you’ll like this one, as well.  Does
> it really need to be seen on the big screen?  Doesn’t hurt – totally worth
> a matinee.  And if you have watched the original in a while, it's definitely
> worth watching again.  Even though it was made 23 freakin' years ago (can
> you believe that?), it still holds up great and could have been made this
> year.
>
>
>
> ~Ron
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Unique Geek" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<theuniquegeek%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Unique Geek" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.

Reply via email to