i would wager this is a calculated maneuver on his part to: A) Cause router manufacturers to change their set ups as the article mentions toward the end, or
B) Get the manufactures to hire him on a mercenary level to implement the fix for them...for a price On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Luke <[email protected]> wrote: > Wow. So the guy is legally allowed to release malicious code into the > wild despite the potential harm it could cause. What a yutz. > > > On Jul 21, 1:21 pm, "Edward Crosby" <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is pretty scary. > > > > http://bit.ly/d3WqQ4 > > > > -- > > Have a Better One, > > Edward Crosbyhttp://www.edwardcrosby.com > > ----- > > "There are no atheists in foxholes or firmware updates." > > Merlin Mann > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Unique Geek" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<theuniquegeek%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Unique Geek" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.
