It's funny that a few of you continue to post that quote. I think it's
also funny someone would have a problem with "scantily clad women fighting
things".
Personally, even though I thought the movie was kind of just okay I still
enjoy seeing women kick ass, more so when they are hot, and this movie was
all about women kicking ass. I liked that a lot. It goes right in line
with one of my favorite "Female Power" movies I generally like to watch at
least once a year, Tank Girl. I can still see myself watching Sucker Punch
again later from Netflix. Maybe after a second viewing I might have a
better opinion of it.

-- 
Have a Better One,
Edward Crosby
http://about.me/edwardcrosby
-----
"There are no atheists in foxholes or firmware updates."
Merlin Mann


> " The movie just seemed to be an excuse to show scantily clad women
> fighting
> things,"
>
> This is entirely the WRONG attitude to go into the movie with.  Those who
> go
> into it thinking that have typically replied they were "bored" with it.  I
> think the movie may have not been marketed corriectly--it isn't a "popcorn
> movie"--it is a movie with thought and subtext, which may sound weird but
> it's true.
>
> Personally, I loved it and it is actually one of my favorite movies, but I
> am the perfect audience for it, tho you would not think so seeing the
> trailers.  I thought it was brilliant and that the people who don't like
> it
> don't really get it, or at the very least didn't get what they expected
> and
> were thrown by it.  Basically you want to look at it as sort of like Girl
> Interrupted, if Winona Ryder and Angelia Jolie and Brittany Murphy got to
> do
> cool stuff and get back at the oppressive patriarchal system that led them
> to be in an asylum.  :-)
>
> Holly
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Jason Service <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  " The movie just seemed to be an excuse to show scantily clad women
>> fighting things,"
>>
>> that sentence has so much promise...and the fact that the film still
>> failed
>> for you...not best.
>>
>>   On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Hollister4Mayor <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> To be perfectly honest with you Ed. I thought it was a horrible movie.
>>> I thought it was really dumb. And about twenty minutes into the film I
>>> figured out everything that was going to happen. The movie just seemed
>>> to be an excuse to show scantily clad women fighting things, and I
>>> like movies like that but this was done in a very poor manner. I
>>> really didn't like it.
>>>
>>> On Apr 22, 1:33 pm, Jason Service <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > yeah, haven't seen it, and like Shag, just isn't on top of my to do
>>> list.
>>> > There are other films i am looking forward to more...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:51 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > >  Haven't seen it.  Would like to, but not high on my must-do list
>>> right
>>> > > now.
>>> >
>>> > > The Irredeemable Shag
>>> > >http://firestormfan.com
>>> > >http://onceuponageek.com
>>> > >http://twitter.com/onceuponageek
>>> >
>>> > >   -------- Original Message --------
>>> > > Subject: Re: [The Unique Geek] Has Sucker Punch been discussed yet?
>>>  > > From: "Edward Crosby" <[email protected]>
>>> > > Date: Fri, April 22, 2011 10:54 am
>>> > > To: [email protected]
>>> >
>>> > > Nobody has comments on the movie? Am I the only one that has seen
>>> it?
>>> > > I would love to hear what others have to say.
>>> >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Have a Better One,
>>> > > Edward Crosby
>>> > >http://about.me/edwardcrosby
>>> > > -----
>>> > > "There are no atheists in foxholes or firmware updates."
>>> > > Merlin Mann
>>> >
>>> > > > I searched but didn't see we discussed this movie yet. I finally
>>> saw
>>> > > > Sucker Punch this past weekend.
>>> > > > **Possible Spoilers**
>>> >
>>> > > > Overall, I thought it was a pretty decent movie. It had some
>>> really
>>> good
>>> > > > action and great visual effects. The soundtrack totally kicked
>>> ass;
>>> I
>>> > > just
>>> > > > bought it on Amazon and am listening to it now. However, thinking
>>> about
>>> > > > it, most of the movie seemed like a music video stretched out,
>>> because of
>>> > > > all the slow motion, to 2 hours.
>>> > > > I plan on seeing it again when it comes out on DVD to reevaluate.
>>> >
>>> > > > On the subject of slow motion in movies: Like 3D, I am getting
>>> really
>>> > > sick
>>> > > > and tired of the over use of slow motion in movies.
>>> Unfortunately, I
>>> > > > rented Resident Evil: Afterlife on Netflix and noticed how, it
>>> seemed, an
>>> > > > hours worth of the hour and half film was in slow motion. In my
>>> opinion,
>>> > > > that is just cheap and lazy movie making. If they had sped up all
>>> the
>>> > > > action sequences in that movie it probably would have actually
>>> been
>>> an
>>> > > > hour long movie. I'm glad I didn't pay full price at the theaters
>>> for
>>> > > that
>>> > > > movie.
>>> > > > I paid matinee price ($8.50) on Sucker Punch so not too much
>>> money
>>> was
>>> > > > wasted on the slow motion sequences there.
>>> >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > Have a Better One,
>>> > > > Edward Crosby
>>> > > >http://about.me/edwardcrosby
>>> > > > -----
>>> > > > "There are no atheists in foxholes or firmware updates."
>>> > > > Merlin Mann
>>> >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>> Google
>>> Groups
>>> > > > "The Unique Geek" group.
>>> > > > To post to this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]
>>> .
>>> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> > > > [email protected].
>>> > > > For more options, visit this group at
>>> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.
>>> >
>>> > > --
>>> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups
>>> > > "The Unique Geek" group.
>>> > > To post to this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> > > [email protected].
>>> > > For more options, visit this group at
>>> > >http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.
>>> >
>>> > > --
>>> > >  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups
>>> > > "The Unique Geek" group.
>>> > > To post to this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> > > [email protected].
>>> > > For more options, visit this group at
>>> > >http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.- Hide quoted
>>> text
>>> -
>>> >
>>> > - Show quoted text -
>>>
>>> --
>>>  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "The Unique Geek" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>> --
>>  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> "The Unique Geek" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Holly Elliott
> [email protected]
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Unique Geek" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Unique Geek" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.

Reply via email to