Maybe they think people who read a Firestorm blog are bigger suckers ;)

~Ron




________________________________
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tue, May 10, 2011 12:12:33 AM
Subject: RE: [The Unique Geek] Thought this was interesting given our 
occasional 
spammer to the list serve

Apparently my spammers haven't gotten that smart yet. All the URLs I get are 
totally obvious.  



Spam is a weird thing.  My Firestorm blog averages about 75 Spam comments a day 
(thank goodness for Akismet!), whereas my Once Upon a Geek blog is averaging 
only about 10 Spam comments a day.  It's weird because my Firestorm blog gets 
way fewer hits than my other blog.  Regardless, Akismet is from heaven!


The Irredeemable Shag
http://firestormfan.com
http://onceuponageek.com
http://twitter.com/onceuponageek



-------- Original Message --------
>Subject: Re: [The Unique Geek] Thought this was interesting given our
>occasional spammer to the list serve
>From: Jennifer Walker <[email protected]>
>Date: Mon, May 09, 2011 10:00 am
>To: [email protected]
>
>I've been getting those bing.com and yahoo.com "comments" this last week on 
>old 
>webcomic posts. I give them credit for craftiness as Akismet has yet to catch 
>up 
>to this tactic but, really, the commenter always seems to misspell one of the 
>last words. Every. single. comment.
>
>
>On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Cary Preston <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>For most of you, Tetherd Cow is an unfolding story of antics in Cow World that 
>plays out on a fairly linear daily or weekly basis. You know how it goes – I 
>post a story, you comment, we have a some fun repartee and then we move on. 
>Very 
>civilized. But because I have an expansive overview of The Cow (a Cowish 
>‘omnipotence’ as it were) the Cowiverse looks somewhat different to me. I see 
>a 
>whole lot of stuff to which you are not privvy. There is, for example, 
>activity 
>that occurs way back in time, in posts that have had their moment in the sun 
>and 
>are never visited again except by the occasional lost web traveller. Or by 
>spammers. Spammers discovered long ago that the vast hinterland of forgotten 
>blog comments provides another fertile venue for their pathetic attempts to 
>hawk 
>various car insurance/viagra/cheap mortgage/locksmith(i) schemes. Because 
>visiting millions of blogs and posting comments is (quite obviously) a tedious 
>and time consuming task, the spammers have mostly relegated this drudgework to 
>bots. Sometimes very clever bots, but bots all the same. Bots are mostly 
>pretty 
>easy to defeat, and these days most bot comments get swept up by blog spam 
>utilities and never see the light of day.(ii)
>>Recently, though, a new spamming ruse appears to be on the rise. This 
>>technique 
>>requires real people to spend time browsing around blogs and posting comments 
>>and linking their names to some crap or other.(iii) Here’s one that I got 
>>yesterday:
>>This was a comment left on my post Ooze which you may remember concerned the 
>>curious fungus that once appeared in my backyard. On the face of it, ‘Jeff’ 
>>appears to be taking an interest in the post and leaving a pertinent comment 
>>– 
>>he is obviously not a bot. 
>>
>>What the spammers don’t appear to understand, though, is that when a 
>>commenter 
>>leaves his or her mark on TCA comments, I can tell all kinds of things about 
>>them other than just their email address and their name. I know, for 
>>instance, 
>>that while Jeff Morgan is (most likely) a real person, with a real Bigpond 
>>email 
>>address, it is not the real Jeff Morgan who has visited my blog. Someone has 
>>stolen his name and email address for the purposes of making their spam look 
>>legitimate. The clue to Fake Jeff’s real agenda is written clear in two 
>>places – 
>>one is in his IP address which comes out of Pakistan, and the other is in 
>>‘his’ 
>>website which is easily recognizable(iv) as a ‘front-door’ for a spam 
>>operation 
>>linking off to various kinds of crummy products.(v)
>>As is usual in these cases, I leave the comment intact and ‘repair’ the 
>>weblink 
>>to take it somewhere a little more useful.(vi) This morning though, I got a 
>>rather intriguing one of these ‘comments’ from ‘Mircea’:
>>This one appeared in my post We’re All DOOMED! as a reply to Cissy Strutt. 
>>Unlike Jeff’s comment, it only half makes sense, but I have had far more 
>>incomprehensible legitimate comments in my time. ‘Mircea’ evidently thinks 
>>that 
>>by embedding it in the flow of commenting (he/she would have to have 
>>physically 
>>clicked the ‘Reply’ button) that it would go unnoticed.(vii) But I don’t see 
>>comments the same way as commenters do, and for me it’s a trivial exercise to 
>>spot it as spam. Here’s part of what I see:
>>Did you see the very interesting thing here, Cowpokes? ‘Mircea’ appears to be 
>>spamming for Microsoft. Oh, I’m sure that Microsoft would deny having 
>>anything 
>>to do with such a practice. They would, most likely, claim that anyone can 
>>type 
>>any URL in the web field and that they can’t be held responsible for random 
>>punters being fans of their search engine. But It is easy for me to see that 
>>‘Mircea’ is not a legitimate entity: she/he has an IP in Quebec and an ISP in 
>>Germany – a very curious and probably impossible combination. Additionally, 
>>this 
>>is not the only one of these I’ve had in recent times. 
>>
>>There is a bit of discussion going on about this elsewhere, and one 
>>suggestion 
>>has been that the Bing URL is being truncated in some way and that Bing (and 
>>Yahoo as it turns out)(viii) are just victims of a software snafu. But I want 
>>to 
>>point out that the way these blog commenting systems work does not support 
>>that 
>>conclusion – if people are physically reading the posts and entering 
>>comments, 
>>they are also physically entering the URLs they have been given to promote. 
>>To 
>>put it in clear terms, ‘Mircea’ is a fraudulent identity who has visited an 
>>historically distant Tetherd Cow Ahead post with the sole intention of 
>>leaving a 
>>link to Bing. 
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>Footnotes:
>>      1. Yes. A New York locksmith and his pals were, apparently, touring the 
>>blogosphere and leaving comments in an attempt to boost their linkability. 
>>Rather sad, really.
>>      2. My spam tools automatically shift such comments into the spam 
>> graveyard 
>>without me even being aware of them. On average, TCA gets about forty of 
>>these a 
>>day.
>>      3. The technical reason they do this is to increase the number of 
>> legitimate 
>>websites ‘linking’ to their garbage product. This, in turn, increases their 
>>search ranking in various engines. Search engines find it easy to defeat 
>>standard spambot link farming, but this kind of ‘human’ bot requires (so far) 
>>human brains to intercept. And not only that, human brains that understand 
>>the 
>>context of their own blogs.
>>      4. By a person, at least.
>>      5. Typically, these ‘front’-door’ sites are set up as link farms into 
>> products 
>>that the spammer has been paid to ‘advertise’. They are disposable sites that 
>>will be abandoned as soon as they are busted, only to spring up somewhere 
>>else 
>>in a matter of minutes. The spammers probably have thousands of them on the 
>>shelf, ready to go.
>>      6. I usually redirect it to the JREF, because I think if there’s one 
>> thing we 
>>could do with a whole heap more of in this world, it’s some rational 
>>thinking. 
>>Can’t ever have too many links to the JREF. Did I mention the JREF?
>>      7. And I guess on a lot of blogs maybe it would have.
>>      8. I’ve also had several linked off to Yahoo.
>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>
>>
>>http://www.tetherdcow.com/?p=11837
>>
>>
>>
>>Sent with MobileRSS HD
-- 
>>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>"The 
>>Unique Geek" group.
>>To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>[email protected].
>>For more options, visit this group at 
>>http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Jennifer "Scraps" Walker
>Queen of the Helper Monkeys
>
>Better living through creativity... and cocktails!
>http://www.scrapsoflife.com/blog
>
-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
>Unique Geek" group.
>To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>[email protected].
>For more options, visit this group at 
>http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.
> 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Unique Geek" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Unique Geek" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.

Reply via email to