Good call.  The Scott Lang incarnation would be the most interesting
on-screen.  With that said, I gotta imagine they are still looking at the
Eric O'Grady version.  Eric O'Grady was created by Robert Kirkman, who also
created Walking Dead.  Hollywood will often pursue a property just because
of the previous success of the people involved.

Shag


On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Luke Jaconetti <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have been reading some early Hank Pym adventures (albeit as Giant Man
> moreso than Ant-Man) and part of me would really like a retro, Two-Fisted
> Man Of Science and His Girl Friday kind of story like the Tales To Astonish
> stories have been.  I wouldn't want Hank Pym to be portrayed as a wife
> beating nutcase, nor as the guy who is not quite as smart as Tony Stark and
> not quite as strong as Thor (which in and of itself I thought was a very
> good retcon but only because it addressed his pettiness and jealousy which
> other writers emphasised).
>
> As I said, if Edgar Wright is still developing the film, then Eric O'Grady
> makes sense.  What is less clear to me though is how you would incorporate
> the Irredeemable Ant-Man into the Avengers (assumingly) for the sequel.  He
> does not play well with others and giving him a conscience I think would
> defeat the point.
>
> Scott Lang I think actually can work for a film.  He's a single Dad with a
> cute little daughter, just a work a day engineer who happens to be really
> smart.    Hollywood loves cute kids, and you can introduce a love interest
> for him and do cutsey things with her and the kid.  And it would also make
> him demonstrably different from the other Avengers -- Scott Lang is the
> "everyman," not a living legend or international celebrity or demigod.  And
> unlike the hyper-professional Black Widow and Hawkeye, he brings a real
> "man on the street" point of view.
>
> Another question is who the badguy would be?  I can only think of a
> handful of Ant-Man villains -- Whirlwind/Human Top, Egghead,uh...
> Porcupine? -- and they are not exactly world beaters.  Egghead seems like
> the natural choice if you use Pym (maybe Whirlwind can be his henchman?),
> but the others are less clear.
>
> My main thought is that whomever they use, hopefully it will have the same
> effect it had for Shellhead and re-establish Ant-Man as more of a major
> player in the Marvel Universe.  Just my thoughts.
>
>
> On Monday, October 15, 2012 10:34:08 PM UTC-4, Shag wrote:
>
>> I'd be up for an Eric O'Grady story, but that might just be the
>> Irredeemable fan in me.  :)
>>
>>
>> The Irredeemable Shag (and yes, I stole the name from Robert Kirkman's
>> Ant-Man)
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:46 PM, James Peluso <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> I'm hoping for Hank Pym/WASP story line. I might be one of the few that
>>> wish he wasn't left out of the Avengers fold.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Luke Jaconetti <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www.newsarama.com/film/**disney-marvel-studios-ant-man-**
>>>> release-date.html<http://www.newsarama.com/film/disney-marvel-studios-ant-man-release-date.html>
>>>>
>>>> Take it with a grain of salt, I suppose, but after many years of
>>>> development it looks like Ant-Man may finally move forward.  Edgar Wright
>>>> was attached to this project as director for a long time.  Which begs the
>>>> question of which Ant-Man?  Wright's comedy chops suggests Eric O'Grady,
>>>> but it could just as easily be Hank Pym or Scott Lang.
>>>>
>>>> Also, Iron Man 3 and Thor 2 will be in 3D, which should thrill everyone
>>>> on the listserv.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "The Unique Geek" group.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/**
>>>> msg/theuniquegeek/-/**zgLOblfj33QJ<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/theuniquegeek/-/zgLOblfj33QJ>
>>>> .
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]**.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to theuniquegee...@**
>>>> googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
>>>> group/theuniquegeek?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jim
>>>
>>> blog <http://jimpeluso.wordpress.com>
>>> "Keep moving Forward"
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "The Unique Geek" group.
>>>  To post to this group, send email to [email protected]**.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to theuniquegee...@**
>>> googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
>>> group/theuniquegeek?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Unique Geek" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/theuniquegeek/-/YiGxiWOt0n0J.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Unique Geek" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.

Reply via email to