http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2313367/CISPA-Amendment-US-cyber-attack-law-banning-employers-asking-Facebook-passwords-blocked.html

U.S. employees set to be forced to give bosses their Facebook PASSWORDS

A last minute alteration to CISPA was defeated in a Congress vote
It would have protected user's social media passwords from employers
The late amendment was put forward by Democrat Ed Perlmutter
By Steve Nolan

PUBLISHED: 04:00 EST, 23 April 2013 | UPDATED: 05:46 EST, 23 April 2013


An attempt to ban US bosses from asking employees to hand over their Facebook 
login details has been blocked by Congress.

A last minute alteration to the controversial Cyber Intelligence Sharing and 
Protection Act (CISPA) that would have prevented employers demanding that 
prospective employees disclose social media passwords as a condition of 
employment was voted down in the house of representatives.

The proposal, put forward by Democrat Ed Perlmutter was defeated by a 224-189 
majority, according to the Huffington Post.


Invasion of privacy? An amendment to a new US bill on cyber attacks aimed at 
preventing employers asking prospective employees for their Facebook login has 
been rejected


Checking up: CISPA does nothing to address concerns that US employers can 
legitimately ask employees for social media login details as a condition of 
employment (file picture)

Handing over passwords could legally be a condition of acquiring or keeping a 
job, said WebProNews.

Perlmutter said of his amendment before it was defeated: 'It helps the 
individual protect his right to privacy and it doesn't allow the employer to 
impersonate that particular employee when other people are interacting with 
that person across social media platforms.

 

He warned of an invasion of privacy and the potential of employers to 
'impersonate' employees online.

The Democrat initially proposed the password privacy measure as part of the 
Federal Communications Commission Process Reform Act of 2012 and warned that 
social media users have a reasonable expectation of privacy.


Blocked: The amendment to CISPA was put forward by Democrat Ed Permutter who 
says that social media users have an expectation of privacy

In a statement he added: 'They have an expectation that their right to free 
speech and religion will be respected when they use social media outlets. 

'No American should have to provide their confidential personal passwords as a 
condition of employment.'

Perlmutter faced criticism from bill sponsor Mike Rogers who claimed that he 
was trying to kill the act.

He said that the issue should be addressed in separate legislation.

But previous attempts to counteract the increasing trend of employers asking 
for prospective employees social networking login details have failed.

The Password Protection Act 2012 was introduced to Senators and Congressman but 
was not passed.

The overall act would allow the US Government and private companies such as 
Facebook to share information with one another should they come under cyber 
attack.

But critics of the contentious bill, which initially failed when it was 
rejected by Senators last year, say that it would bypass privacy laws and allow 
companies to hand over users' information to the Government.

They claim that it would prevent companies who hand over people's personal 
details from facing legal action and effectively justify social media spying. 

But CISPA recieved support from both Democrats and Republicans in the House of 
Representatives.


Reassurance: Facebook told its US users earlier this month that it has no 
intention of sharing sensitive personal information

Although the Act was ratified by the House of Representatives, there is a good 
chance that it could yet fall through.

CISPA was also approved by Congress in April 2012, but was rejected by the 
Senate. The White House even threatened to veto the act at the time.

Republicans Mike Rogers and Dutch Ruppersberger have once again put CISPA 
forward as they say that it is vital that companies have the ability to stop 
threats materialising in light of an increase in the number of foreign cyber 
attacks from countries like China.

Facebook initially came out in support of CISPA, but its name has since 
disappeared from a list of firms fully supporting the bill this time around.


Under threat: CISPA is aimed at allowing companies to share information to 
thwart potential cyber attacks

And the social networking site vice president of US Public Policy Joel Kaplan 
reassured users that Facebook has no intention of sharing sensitive personal 
information with the Government.

He said: 'The overriding goal of any cybersecurity bill should be to protect 
the security of networks and private data, and we take any concerns about how 
legislation might negatively impact Internet users’ privacy seriously.'

But other big name companies including IBM, Intel, McAfee and Time Warner Cable 
are in favour of CISPA.




 

Share this article:


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Unique Geek" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to