Happy new year indeed :)

Okay. In the second set of results - where things aren't quite right -  
we're getting a lot of sphinx_internal_ids set to 2. That is not what  
we want. It seems it's a Riddle (my code) or Sphinx (not my code) bug  
then, not Thinking Sphinx. Progress.

Just going back to the search command line tool. Can you email the  
output of that using the second (dodgy) setup, just to check whether  
we're getting the same attributes returned.

Cheers

-- 
Pat

On 01/01/2009, at 2:19 PM, farmer wrote:

>
> Hi Pat,
> Happy new year!
>
> Here are the results you asked about, formatted a bit. They're
> interesting. Hopefully I didn't make any typos in transcribing the
> info - unfortunately I can't seem to copy text from my console to the
> clipboard. Firstly, in the case of omitting the attributes public and
> privileged (a set-up that works properly):
>
> -----------------------------
> query: "adjudicator"
> -----------------------------
> total_found:7
> total:7
> words:{"adjud"=>{:docs=>7,:hits=>141}}
> status:0
> time:0.0
>
> attribute_names: author_sort, from_sort, to_sort, legal_case_id, code,
> importance, last_access, date_written, created_at, updated_at,
> doc_type, doc_file_type, physical_folder, sphinx_internal_id,
> class_crc, subclass_crcs, sphinx_deleted
>
> attributes: physical_folder => 3, author_sort => 3, updated_at => 2,
> code => 3, doc_file_type => 3, doc_type => 3, sphinx_deleted => 1,
> subclass_crcs => 1073741825, class_crc => 1, last_access => 2, to_sort
> => 3, legal_case_id => 1, from_sort => 3, importance => 1,
> sphinx_internal_id => 1, created_at => 2, date_written => 1
>
> matches:
>
> index:0
> weight:1
> attributes:
>
> physical_folder:2
> author_sort:0
> updated_at:1229445089
> code:0
> doc_file_type:2
> doc_type:0
> sphinx_deleted:0
> subclass_crcs:[555739168]
> class_crc:555739168
> last_access:0
> to_sort:0
> legal_case_id:10
> from_sort:0
> importance:0
> sphinx_internal_id:2232
> created_at:1229445089
> date_written:0
> doc:2232
>
> index:1
> weight:1
> attributes:
>
> physical_folder:2
> author_sort:0
> updated_at:1229445091
> code:0
> doc_file_type:2
> doc_type:0
> sphinx_deleted:0
> subclass_crcs:[555739168]
> class_crc:555739168
> last_access:0
> to_sort:0
> legal_case_id:10
> from_sort:0
> importance:0
> sphinx_internal_id:2236
> created_at:1229445091
> date_written:0
> doc:2236
>
> [ed: abridging now...]
>
> index:2
> physical_folder:2
> doc_file_type:2
> doc_type:0
> sphinx_internal_id:2238
> doc:2238
>
> index:3
> physical_folder:2
> doc_file_type:2
> doc_type:0
> sphinx_internal_id:2239
> doc:2239
>
> index:4
> physical_folder:2
> doc_file_type:2
> doc_type:0
> sphinx_internal_id:2240
> doc:2240
>
> index:5
> physical_folder:2
> doc_file_type:0
> doc_type:0
> sphinx_internal_id:2262
> doc:2262
>
> index:6
> physical_folder:2
> doc_file_type:0
> doc_type:0
> sphinx_internal_id:2265
> doc:2265
> -------------------------------------
>
> Now running the same query on an index including all attributes:
>
> -------------------------------------
> total_found:7
> total:7
> words:{"adjud"=>{:docs=>7,:hits=>141}}
> status:0
> time:0.0
>
> attribute_names: author_sort, from_sort, to_sort, legal_case_id, code,
> pub, privileged, importance, last_access, date_written, created_at,
> updated_at, doc_type, doc_file_type, physical_folder,
> sphinx_internal_id, class_crc, subclass_crcs, sphinx_deleted
>
> attributes: physical_folder => 3, author_sort => 3, updated_at => 2,
> code => 3, doc_file_type => 3, doc_type => 3, sphinx_deleted => 1,
> subclass_crcs => 1073741825, class_crc => 1, last_access => 2, to_sort
> => 3, pub => 4, privileged => 4, legal_case_id => 1, from_sort => 3,
> importance => 1, sphinx_internal_id => 1, created_at => 2,
> date_written => 1
>
> matches:
>
> index:0
> weight:1
> attributes:
>
> physical_folder:2
> author_sort:0
> updated_at:1229445089
> code:0
> doc_file_type:0
> doc_type:0
> sphinx_deleted:0
> subclass_crcs:[555739168]
> class_crc:555739168
> last_access:0
> to_sort:0
> public:0
> privileged:0
> legal_case_id:10
> from_sort:0
> importance:0
> sphinx_internal_id:2
> created_at:1229445089
> date_written:0
> doc:2232
>
> index:1
> weight:1
> attributes:
>
> physical_folder:2
> author_sort:0
> updated_at:1229445091
> code:0
> doc_file_type:0
> doc_type:0
> sphinx_deleted:0
> subclass_crcs:[555739168]
> class_crc:555739168
> last_access:0
> to_sort:0
> public:0
> privileged:0
> legal_case_id:10
> from_sort:0
> importance:0
> sphinx_internal_id:2
> created_at:1229445091
> date_written:0
> doc:2236
>
> [ed: abridging now...]
>
> index:2
> physical_folder:2
> doc_file_type:0
> doc_type:0
> sphinx_internal_id:2238
> doc:2238
>
> index:3
> physical_folder:2
> doc_file_type:0
> doc_type:0
> sphinx_internal_id:2
> doc:2239
>
> index:4
> physical_folder:2
> doc_file_type:0
> doc_type:0
> sphinx_internal_id:2
> doc:2240
>
> index:5
> physical_folder:0
> doc_file_type:0
> doc_type:0
> sphinx_internal_id:2
> doc:2262
>
> index:6
> physical_folder:0
> doc_file_type:0
> doc_type:0
> sphinx_internal_id:2
> doc:2265
>
> ---------------------------------
> The constant stream of sphinx_internal_id==2 in the second set of
> results is reflected in development.log: I am getting an array
> [2,2,2,2,2....] returned by sphinx instead of the [0,0,0,....] I was
> getting before. I don't know what I changed to bring that about. Note
> the changes in the values of physical_folder and doc_file_type between
> the two sets:
>
> In the first set:
>
> results 0-6: physical_folder==2;
> results 0-4: doc_file_type==2;
> results 5-6: doc_file_type==0.
>
> In the second set:
>
> results 0-4: physical_folder==2;
> results 5,6: physical_folder==0;
> results 0-6: doc_file_type==0.
>
> The values of pub & privileged were ==0 for all hits (in the second
> set).
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to