Thanks Pat. Yeah it seems the git convention is to just live on the edge which personally makes me just a tad nervous :)
If master is always stable and backwards-compatible then it is not really an issue. Alternatively, a light-weight branching strategy could be to create one stable branch for each supported Sphinx version: For example: /branches/0.9.8-stable /branches/0.9.9-stable Then users of Thinking Sphinx could pull from the branch that matches the current version of Sphinx they are using. I was just trying to determine how I will manage the upgrade of Sphinx and Thinking Sphinx and if the 0.9.9 is not backwards compatible for 0.9.8 Sphinx users I can imagine some trouble when master transitions to 0.9.9. Anyways, thanks again for this great plugin! Tom On Jan 29, 9:29 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Tom > > Master is currently tied to 0.9.8, and will stay that way at least > until 0.9.9 is no longer a release candidate. I've not used tags much > - perhaps I should do so more often. > > The 0.9.9 branch is what people using Sphinx 0.9.9 should use :) > > Cheers > > -- > Pat > > On 30/01/2009, at 5:24 AM, Tom Davies wrote: > > > > > Hi Pat, > > > I noticed you haven't tagged a release of Thinking Sphinx in a while > > so just wondering if master is tied to Sphinx 0.9.8 and if so is it > > the recommended stable branch to use? I am interested in some of the > > recent additions such as wordforms and stopwords configuration. > > > I also noticed there is a 0.9.9 tag which I assume may not be > > guaranteed to work on 0.9.8. > > > Thanks, > > Tom --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
