Hi Jaime If you write it as a re-usable plugin, I'll definitely look into incorporating it into Thinking Sphinx itself (and will translate to RSpec where possible).
Thanks -- Pat On 03/03/2009, at 9:55 AM, John McGrath wrote: > Jaime, thanks for proposing this--I'd be super interested in the > shoulda macros. > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Jaime Bellmyer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I just finished reading the Thinking Sphinx pdf from PeepCode. One > thing struck me: there are no tests available to me, the developer, as > I add indexing options to my models. Perhaps I've been spoiled by > ThoughtBot :) > > I plan to write tests for my own use, and roll them into a plugin. My > question to the group is, if I put forth the extra effort to make it > suitable for public use, would anyone like to use it? I use shoulda, > so I'll definitely write shoulda test macros, like "should_index > [last_name, first_name], :as => :name". If there's public interest, > I'll create vanilla TestUnit versions, as well. Someone else would be > welcome to contribute RSpec versions, or any other test platform :) > > Also, I'd be more than happy to work on integrating these tests into a > patch for Thinking Sphinx itself, although initially it'll be a > separate add-on plugin. > > Thanks, > > Jaime > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
