merged and pushed - thanks Dan! -- Pat
On 20/02/2009, at 11:43 PM, Dan Pickett wrote: > ok - I took a crack at it here. > > http://github.com/dpickett/thinking-sphinx/tree/generic_job > > Regards, > Dan > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Pat Allan <p...@freelancing- > gods.com> wrote: > > Definitely option 1 :) > > Looking forward to seeing the commits > > -- Pat > > On 20/02/2009, at 1:09 PM, Dan Pickett wrote: > > > I'm in total agreement. I started building it out and figured it > > would start to get really ugly with other async tools. > > > > Here's what I propose - in addition to setting delta to the defined > > subset of symbols, you could also assign a instance of a class that > > inherits from ThinkingSphinx::Deltas::DefaultDelta. So the call > > could look like what's in the gist below. > > > > http://gist.github.com/67258 > > > > Let me know which syntax style you prefer and I'll build it out. > > > > Thanks, > > Dan > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Pat Allan <p...@freelancing- > > gods.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Dan > > > > I'm loathe to add a new delta adapter for every async tool... but, > > perhaps you could refactor the delayed-job one so it's relatively > > generic, then add the specific delayed job one in (or leave the > > current code as it is), and build the workling one, but keep it > out of > > the TS source - add it in RAILS_ROOT/lib or something, then put it > on > > github? I guess you could wrap it into a plugin, although that > feels a > > little like overkill. > > > > You'd also need to figure out how to hook it into TS so it accepts > it > > as a delta option. alias_method possibly, but if there's a more > > elegant solution, that'd be fantastic. > > > > That said, I've not used Workling (although I had spoken with Rany > > about what queuing system would be best for TS), so I'm not sure how > > much work it'd be. > > > > Cheers > > > > -- > > Pat > > > > On 20/02/2009, at 4:22 AM, Dan Pickett wrote: > > > > > Would it be bloat to add an adapter for async delta indexing with > > > Workling? I have a bunch of process monitoring setup with it, and > > > would prefer to have one job manager per application. > > > > > > What does everyone think? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
