Sorry, had to sleep, but now able to rethink this. The issue - I think, although it's odd that it happens via Riddle but not via the search tool - is that you need to have *one* word that many map to, not a many-to-many situation (which is what you had). So, if we decide fussball is the word, then the file should look something like:
bayern > fussball fusball > fussball fusbal > fussball fußball > fussball soccer > fussball So all the different options on the left, and the same definitive term on the right, every time. That said, not sure if wordforms is really the right solution - sounds like you're after *related* words being grouped, instead of replaced. I guess my approach would be to have as much of the relevant information in fields, so a search for Bayern brings up football results anyway. Good luck :) -- Pat On 30/03/2009, at 1:24 AM, Jochen Kaechelin wrote: > > Ok, I think I got it now! > > First rule matches! > > fusball > fussball > fusball > fußball > > would not show the results as if the user searches for "fussball | > fußball". It's the same > as he would search for "fußball" only. > > Correct? > > Hmm .. my intention was to "connect" several words not included in the > index with some > products. > > So "Bayern" is a famous german soccer club and I wanted to show all > products inlcuding > "fussball" and "fußball" > > bayern > fussball > bayern > fußball > > But thats wrong ... I only get those products including "fußball" ... > > So, I need to find another way to achieve this .... > > Many Thanks Pat ... great support .... > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
