What's in your development.sphinx.conf file?

--  
Pat

On 26/05/2009, at 11:57 AM, Mickaël wrote:

>
> Hi Pat,
>
> Yes, when I'm searching with 'search' tool, or with TS (without
> filters), the result is equal.
>
> When I'm searching with filter (:ts_forum_posts_ids) TS don't threat
> the foreign_key post_id NULL.
>
> On 26 mai, 20:51, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Mickaël
>>
>> Hmm, not entirely sure what the problem is yet - but just so you  
>> know,
>> Sphinx treats NULLs in attributes as 0's.
>>
>> If you remove the filters, do you get the same results as using the
>> 'search' command-line tool?
>>
>> --
>> Pat
>>
>> On 26/05/2009, at 9:19 AM, Mickaël Allain wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everybody,
>>
>>> I want to index and search over a class model (include has filter)
>>> which could be like this.
>>
>>> class ForumPost < ActiveRecord::Base
>>>   validates_presence_of :title, :content
>>
>>>   belongs_to :forum_section, :foreign_key=> :section_id
>>>   belongs_to :forum_post, :foreign_key=> :post_id
>>>    
>>> has_many :forum_posts,:foreign_key=> :post_id, :dependent=>:destroy
>>>   belongs_to :user
>>
>>> xss_terminate :html5lib_sanitize => [ :content ]
>>
>>>    # Definition de l index de recherche
>>>  define_index do
>>>    # General (Mots cles / Nom du forum / Sous-Forum Categorie /
>>> Auteur / Nombre de reponses)
>>>    indexes title, :as => :ts_forum_post_title
>>>    indexes content, :as => :ts_forum_post_content
>>
>>>    has forum_post(:id), :as => :ts_forum_post_ids
>>
>>>    # Propriete sur les recherches
>>>    set_property :enable_star => 1
>>>    set_property :min_prefix_len => 1
>>
>>>  end
>>> end
>>
>>> If the ForumPost is the TOPIC, they don't have forum_post value
>>> (NULL value), and their reply forum_post value will be the TOPIC ID.
>>
>>> To be more clear, an example of my database
>>
>>> "id
>>> ";"title
>>> ";"content 
>>> ";"user_id";"section_id";"post_id";"created_at";"updated_at"
>>> "41";"TOPIC";"<p>cvxcvxcvcx<br/></p>";"11";"15";NULL;"2009-05-06
>>> 10:01:07";"2009-05-06 10:01:07"
>>> "44";"reply_1";"<p>cxvxv<br/></p>";"11";"15";"41";"2009-05-06
>>> 10:01:50";"2009-05-06 10:01:50"
>>> "45";"reply_2";"<p>vxvcxvxc<br/></p>";"11";"15";"41";"2009-05-06
>>> 10:02:10";"2009-05-06 10:02:10"
>>
>>> When i'm searching for "cx*" in Search client, the result is good
>>
>>> search --config /home/gamez/project/uneek/trunk/config/
>>> development.sphinx.conf cx*
>>
>>> displaying matches:
>>> 1. document=410, weight=1, ts_forum_post_ids=41,
>>> sphinx_internal_id=41, class_crc=3624676887,
>>> subclass_crcs=(3624676887), sphinx_deleted=0
>>>     id=41
>>>     title=TOPIC
>>>     content=<p>cvxcvxcvcx<br/></p>
>>>     user_id=11
>>>     section_id=15
>>>     post_id=(NULL)
>>>     created_at=2009-05-06 10:01:07
>>>     updated_at=2009-05-06 10:01:07
>>> 2. document=440, weight=1, ts_forum_post_ids=44,
>>> sphinx_internal_id=44, class_crc=3624676887,
>>> subclass_crcs=(3624676887), sphinx_deleted=0
>>>     id=44
>>>     title=reply_1
>>>     content=<p>cxvxv<br/></p>
>>>     user_id=11
>>>     section_id=15
>>>     post_id=41
>>>     created_at=2009-05-06 10:01:50
>>>     updated_at=2009-05-06 10:01:50
>>> 3. document=440, weight=1, ts_forum_post_ids=45,
>>> sphinx_internal_id=45, class_crc=3624676887,
>>> subclass_crcs=(3624676887), sphinx_deleted=0
>>>     id=45
>>>     title=reply_2
>>>     content=<p>vxvcxvxc<br/></p>
>>>     user_id=11
>>>     section_id=15
>>>     post_id=41
>>>     created_at=2009-05-06 10:01:50
>>>     updated_at=2009-05-06 10:01:50
>>
>>> words:
>>> 1. 'cx*': 3 documents, 6 hits
>>
>>> But, With, thinkingSphinx search and has filter, the result is  
>>> wrong.
>>
>>>     @searches = ThinkingSphinx::Search.search(params[:search]
>>> [:query], :per_page => self.per_page, :classes => [UserProfile,
>>> Community, Article, Event, Forum, Blog, BlogPost, BlogComment,
>>> Forum, ForumPost, ForumSection], :with => {
>>>         :ts_community_ids =>
>>> communities_ids_from_user(current_user.id),
>>>         :ts_blog_comments_ids =>
>>> blog_comments_ids_from_user(current_user.id),
>>>         :ts_blog_post_ids =>
>>> blog_posts_ids_from_user(current_user.id),
>>>         :ts_blog_ids => blog_ids_from_user(current_user.id),
>>>         :ts_forum_ids => forum_ids_from_user(current_user.id),
>>>         :ts_forum_post_ids =>
>>> forum_post_ids_from_user(current_user.id),
>>>         :ts_forum_section_ids =>
>>> forum_section_ids_from_user(current_user.id)
>>>         }
>>>     )
>>
>>> The :ts_forum_post_ids value is [36, 41, 44, 45, 63, 64] but, Sphinx
>>> search, doesn't include 41 ID Document
>>
>>> /* Mongrel Log */
>>> Sphinx: cx*
>>> Sphinx Result: [44, 45]
>>
>>> But, if I delete the line, and search like this
>>
>>>     @searches = ThinkingSphinx::Search.search(params[:search]
>>> [:query], :per_page => self.per_page, :classes => [UserProfile,
>>> Community, Article, Event, Forum, Blog, BlogPost, BlogComment,
>>> Forum, ForumPost, ForumSection], :with => {
>>>         :ts_community_ids =>
>>> communities_ids_from_user(current_user.id),
>>>         :ts_blog_comments_ids =>
>>> blog_comments_ids_from_user(current_user.id),
>>>         :ts_blog_post_ids =>
>>> blog_posts_ids_from_user(current_user.id),
>>>         :ts_blog_ids => blog_ids_from_user(current_user.id),
>>>         :ts_forum_ids => forum_ids_from_user(current_user.id),
>>>         :ts_forum_section_ids =>
>>> forum_section_ids_from_user(current_user.id)
>>>         }
>>>     )
>>
>>> The result is good.
>>
>>> I think TS ignore docs when NULLABLE belongs_to is present and when
>>> we using has keyword. Do you have some idea to fix them ? or i'm
>>> doing something wrong ?
>>
>>> Thank's.
>>
>>> Best regards,
>>
>>> Mickaël ALLAIN.
>>
>>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to