me too
On Jun 9, 4:09 pm, Greg Weber <[email protected]> wrote:
> I got the same result with and without the as alias.
>
> On Jun 8, 9:24 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Are you giving the attribute an alias?
>
> > ie: has relationship.attribute, :as => :relationship_attribute
>
> > --
> > Pat
>
> > On 09/06/2009, at 12:20 AM, Greg Weber wrote:
>
> > > thanks, I am going back to the older version for now.
>
> > > The part of my configuration that threw the error was
>
> > > has_many :relationship
> > > define_index { has relationship(:attribute) }
>
> > > On Jun 8, 8:19 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> Hi Greg
>
> > >> I do try to test on older versions of Rails regularly, but 1.2.6 is
> > >> as
> > >> far back as I go. So if possible, I'd recommend updating to that.
>
> > >> Besides that, can you outline what your actual define_index block is,
> > >> and the associations that you're trying to use?
>
> > >> Also, from memory, I think the assoc method expects a symbol, not a
> > >> string.
>
> > >> Cheers
>
> > >> --
> > >> Pat
>
> > >> On 08/06/2009, at 8:02 PM, Greg Weber wrote:
>
> > >>> I have an app with an old version of rails - 1.2.2
>
> > >>> Thinking Sphinx was mostly working, but then I upgraded to the
> > >>> newest
> > >>> version of sphinx, and it broke both has_many and belongs_to
> > >>> association indexing. It also fails on Rails.configuration, but that
> > >>> was easy enough to work around.
>
> > >>> For any has_many association I get the error
> > >>> "Cannot automatically map attribute #{attribte} in #{Parent
> > >>> Model} ..."
>
> > >>> It is looking in the parent model, not the association model, which
> > >>> seems to be the problem.
>
> > >>> If I do
>
> > >>> define_index do
> > >>> assoc("association_name").attribute
> > >>> end
>
> > >>> Then I don't get a failure message, but the generated sql is still
> > >>> parent_table.attribute with no joining to the association.
>
> > >>> Any help is appreciated. Maybe someone knows the source can point me
> > >>> to where a patch would need to be applied.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
