Hey Pat, Does it matter performance-wise if a selected facet is passed into ThinkingSphinx::Search.search vs. ThinkingSphinx::FacetCollection.for? It would seem if someone didn't mind having their facets filtered, then it would be more convenient to just bypass the facets.for step.
On a separate note, I'd be happy to help with the faceting documentation once I feel like I understand what I'm doing :) James On Jul 23, 7:42 am, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi James > > Yup, was definitely intentional - don't want to hammer the Sphinx > daemon any more than necessary. > > -- > Pat > > On 22/07/2009, at 11:25 PM, James Earl wrote: > > > > > Was the facet api design intentional, in how facets are retrieved > > separate from the search results? I like that it allows you to narrow > > your search while not narrowing the list of facets. :) > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
