Hi Piotr Curiosly, I've not changed the index setup code recently. Is it any different if you use city.population instead of city(:population) ?
-- Pat On 29/07/2009, at 12:44 PM, Piotr Sarnacki wrote: > > Hi, > > I've upgraded sphinx to current master version and there are some > problems with indexing belongs_to fields. > > Let's say I have Article model and it's connected with city, and city > has population as an integer. > > class Article > belongs_to :city > > define_index do > has city(:population), :as => city_population, :type => :integer > end > end > > In older version of sphinx it was correctly indexed. In newer version > thinking sphinx generates: > "articles"."population" AS "city_population" which is not what I > expect. > > I'll try to add some failing tests later in the evening but maybe > someone know how to handle it with new sphinx :) > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
