For closure..... it was a mistake on my end where the config file was sphix.yml instead of sphinx.yml
Manish On Aug 20, 12:41 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > Try *taur* > > -- > Pat > > On 20/08/2009, at 4:19 PM, mrmanishs wrote: > > > > > Hi Pat, > > > I'm not getting any errors, but when I try to do infix searching, no > > results come up. > > > Such as if I index with infix for "restaurant" and do "taur" search, > > no results. > > > Manish > > > On Aug 19, 12:15 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What error are you getting with that configuration? I've just tried > >> it, without any issues. > > >> -- > >> Pat > > >> On 17/08/2009, at 9:51 PM, mrmanishs wrote: > > >>> I am seeing the same thing, and even with enable_star:true, I have > >>> no > >>> luck with infix: > > >>> development: > >>> morphology:stem_en > >>> min_infix_len: 3 > >>> enable_star: true > > >>> Is there something I'm missing? > > >>> On Aug 12, 8:14 am, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> I was able to reproduce it - odd that I've only heard about that > >>>> now. > >>>> To fix it, you can just add enable_star: true to your sphinx.yml. > > >>>> It's a Sphinx issue, not a Thinking Sphinx one. Not sure why it > >>>> happens - considering it actually complains, I assume it's a > >>>> deliberate error. > > >>>> -- > >>>> Pat > > >>>> On 12/08/2009, at 10:37 AM, Uroš Jurglič wrote: > > >>>>> This is the simplest configuration that break. It works if I > >>>>> comment > >>>>> out either lines, but doesn't work if both are present. > > >>>>> development: > >>>>> min_prefix_len: 3 > >>>>> morphology:stem_en > > >>>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Pat Allan <p...@freelancing- > >>>>> gods.com> wrote: > > >>>>> Hi Uros and Valery > > >>>>> Can you post the contents of your config/sphinx.yml files, and > >>>>> describe how you're testing to find the problem? I've not heard of > >>>>> this before, and considering that Thinking Sphinx used to have a > >>>>> defaultmorphologyset, it's odd that this is the first I've heard > >>>>> of > >>>>> such an issue. > > >>>>> Cheers > > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Pat > > >>>>> On 10/08/2009, at 12:19 PM, Uroš Jurglič wrote: > > >>>>>> I have the same issue and I think it's probably not TS but sphinx > >>>>>> related. I was going through spihnx docs and there is no such > >>>>>> limitation obvious. It's not my priority at the moment so I > >>>>>> didn't > >>>>>> delve deeper. Anyway please post the solution, if you find one. > > >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Valery Visnakov > >>>>>> <[email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> Hello community, > > >>>>>> Does anyone faced the problem, whenmin_infix_lenandmorphology > >>>>>> doesn't work together. Actually it uses onlymorphologyand > >>>>> min_infix > >>>>>> doesn't work. > > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Uros Jurglic > > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Uros Jurglic > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
