That is indeed not what I'm looking for, as the results will not be the same :-(
On Aug 28, 10:24 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm, what about: > > "(foo | bax) @title (bar | quux)" > > Although I guess that's not exactly what you want... because bax and > bar together wouldn't come up in either of the simpler searches. > > -- > Pat > > On 28/08/2009, at 3:17 PM, Gerjan wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > Given I have the following two queries: > > > '@* foo @title bar' > > '@* bax @title quux' > > > how can I disjunctively (boolean OR) combine these queries into a > > single query? > > > I tried the following queries: > > > '@* foo @title bar | @* bax @title quux' > > '(@* foo @title bar) | (@* bax @title quux)' > > > but neither would work, or give incorrect results. See also > >http://mmakaay.wordpress.com/2...-for-the-sphinx-search-engine/for a > > similar problem. I also posted this on the Sphinx forum btw. > > > Thanks in advance! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
