Greg wrote: > This definitely looks cleaner but has the disadvantage of introducing > another "field"... I want my end users to write their own search > queries like "title: Brown fox owned_by: John Doe color: blue" etc.
Fair enough, however I'm fairly sure it's not possible to search for empty fields. Maybe you could parse the users query and convert particular commands to an attribute filter? -- James Healy <jimmy-at-deefa-dot-com> Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:44:06 +1000 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
