Sorry, I should have been more clear... in your test.sphinx.conf file, what are the sql_query_pre values in your klass_core_i source?
-- Pat On 15/10/2009, at 11:16 PM, Pat Allan wrote: > > Wow, something's really going wrong there with the sql_query_pre SQL > statements... can you copy and paste the ones from the klass_core_1 > source? > > -- > Pat > > On 15/10/2009, at 7:51 PM, rejeep wrote: > >> >> Sorry for the late reply. >> >> Here's the log: >> Sphinx 0.9.9-rc2 (r1785) >> Copyright (c) 2001-2009, Andrew Aksyonoff >> >> using config file '/home/rejeep/dev/closing/config/ >> test.sphinx.conf'... >> indexing index 'klass_core'... >> ERROR: index 'klass_core': sql_query_pre[0]: Lock wait timeout >> exceeded; try restarting transaction (DSN=mysql:// >> closing:*...@localhost:3306/closing_test). >> total 0 docs, 0 bytes >> total 51.825 sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0.00 docs/sec >> indexing index 'klass_delta'... >> collected 0 docs, 0.0 MB >> collected 0 attr values >> sorted 0.0 Mvalues, nan% done >> total 0 docs, 0 bytes >> total 0.005 sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0.00 docs/sec >> distributed index 'klass' can not be directly indexed; skipping. >> indexing index 'interface_core'... >> ERROR: index 'interface_core': sql_query_pre[0]: Lock wait timeout >> exceeded; try restarting transaction (DSN=mysql:// >> closing:*...@localhost:3306/closing_test). >> total 0 docs, 0 bytes >> total 50.052 sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0.00 docs/sec >> indexing index 'interface_delta'... >> collected 0 docs, 0.0 MB >> collected 0 attr values >> sorted 0.0 Mvalues, nan% done >> total 0 docs, 0 bytes >> total 0.005 sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0.00 docs/sec >> distributed index 'interface' can not be directly indexed; skipping. >> indexing index 'enum_core'... >> ERROR: index 'enum_core': sql_query_pre[0]: Lock wait timeout >> exceeded; try restarting transaction (DSN=mysql:// >> closing:*...@localhost:3306/closing_test). >> total 0 docs, 0 bytes >> total 51.055 sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0.00 docs/sec >> indexing index 'enum_delta'... >> collected 0 docs, 0.0 MB >> collected 0 attr values >> sorted 0.0 Mvalues, nan% done >> total 0 docs, 0 bytes >> total 0.005 sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0.00 docs/sec >> distributed index 'enum' can not be directly indexed; skipping. >> indexing index 'annotation_core'... >> ERROR: index 'annotation_core': sql_query_pre[0]: Lock wait timeout >> exceeded; try restarting transaction (DSN=mysql:// >> closing:*...@localhost:3306/closing_test). >> total 0 docs, 0 bytes >> total 51.058 sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0.00 docs/sec >> indexing index 'annotation_delta'... >> collected 0 docs, 0.0 MB >> collected 0 attr values >> sorted 0.0 Mvalues, nan% done >> total 0 docs, 0 bytes >> total 0.005 sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0.00 docs/sec >> distributed index 'annotation' can not be directly indexed; skipping. >> total 4 reads, 0.000 sec, 32.0 kb/call avg, 0.0 msec/call avg >> total 16 writes, 0.000 sec, 0.0 kb/call avg, 0.0 msec/call avg >> rotating indices: succesfully sent SIGHUP to searchd (pid=11305). >> Loaded suite /usr/bin/rake >> >> On Oct 11, 8:44 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Right. Can you show me the output when it's running slowly? >>> >>> -- >>> Pat >>> >>> On 11/10/2009, at 7:09 PM, rejeep wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> That is not slow at all. But that's because the database does not >>>> contain any records. But if I create a record from a factory in the >>>> test and then run the rake task, also from the test, it will take >>>> forever. >>> >>>> On Oct 11, 1:36 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Either I'm missing it, or there isn't actually any data being >>>>> indexed >>>>> (nor does it seem to be running slowly). What's the output (and >>>>> how >>>>> are you running it) when it *is* running slowly? >>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Pat >>> >>>>> On 10/10/2009, at 1:28 PM, rejeep wrote: >>> >>>>>> The test database is exactly the same as the development. I don't >>>>>> know >>>>>> if it matters, but it's a cucumber test, so it's actually the >>>>>> cucumber >>>>>> environment. But that environment is only linking to test, so it >>>>>> should be exactly the same. >>> >>>>>> $ rake ts:in RAILS_ENV=test >>>>>> (in /home/rejeep/dev/closing) >>>>>> Generating Configuration to /home/rejeep/dev/closing/config/ >>>>>> test.sphinx.conf >>>>>> Sphinx 0.9.9-rc2 (r1785) >>>>>> Copyright (c) 2001-2009, Andrew Aksyonoff >>> >>>>>> using config file '/home/rejeep/dev/closing/config/ >>>>>> test.sphinx.conf'... >>>>>> indexing index 'klass_core'... >>>>>> collected 0 docs, 0.0 MB >>>>>> collected 0 attr values >>>>>> sorted 0.0 Mvalues, nan% done >>>>>> total 0 docs, 0 bytes >>>>>> total 0.005 sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0.00 docs/sec >>>>>> indexing index 'klass_delta'... >>>>>> collected 0 docs, 0.0 MB >>>>>> collected 0 attr values >>>>>> sorted 0.0 Mvalues, nan% done >>>>>> total 0 docs, 0 bytes >>>>>> total 0.001 sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0.00 docs/sec >>>>>> distributed index 'klass' can not be directly indexed; skipping. >>>>>> indexing index 'interface_core'... >>>>>> collected 0 docs, 0.0 MB >>>>>> collected 0 attr values >>>>>> sorted 0.0 Mvalues, nan% done >>>>>> total 0 docs, 0 bytes >>>>>> total 0.002 sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0.00 docs/sec >>>>>> indexing index 'interface_delta'... >>>>>> collected 0 docs, 0.0 MB >>>>>> collected 0 attr values >>>>>> sorted 0.0 Mvalues, nan% done >>>>>> total 0 docs, 0 bytes >>>>>> total 0.001 sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0.00 docs/sec >>>>>> distributed index 'interface' can not be directly indexed; >>>>>> skipping. >>>>>> indexing index 'enum_core'... >>>>>> collected 0 docs, 0.0 MB >>>>>> collected 0 attr values >>>>>> sorted 0.0 Mvalues, nan% done >>>>>> total 0 docs, 0 bytes >>>>>> total 0.001 sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0.00 docs/sec >>>>>> indexing index 'enum_delta'... >>>>>> collected 0 docs, 0.0 MB >>>>>> collected 0 attr values >>>>>> sorted 0.0 Mvalues, nan% done >>>>>> total 0 docs, 0 bytes >>>>>> total 0.001 sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0.00 docs/sec >>>>>> distributed index 'enum' can not be directly indexed; skipping. >>>>>> indexing index 'annotation_core'... >>>>>> collected 0 docs, 0.0 MB >>>>>> collected 0 attr values >>>>>> sorted 0.0 Mvalues, nan% done >>>>>> total 0 docs, 0 bytes >>>>>> total 0.001 sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0.00 docs/sec >>>>>> indexing index 'annotation_delta'... >>>>>> collected 0 docs, 0.0 MB >>>>>> collected 0 attr values >>>>>> sorted 0.0 Mvalues, nan% done >>>>>> total 0 docs, 0 bytes >>>>>> total 0.002 sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0.00 docs/sec >>>>>> distributed index 'annotation' can not be directly indexed; >>>>>> skipping. >>>>>> total 8 reads, 0.000 sec, 32.0 kb/call avg, 0.0 msec/call avg >>>>>> total 32 writes, 0.001 sec, 0.0 kb/call avg, 0.0 msec/call avg >>>>>> Loaded suite /usr/bin/rake >>>>>> Started >>> >>>>>> Finished in 0.000242 seconds. >>> >>>>>> 0 tests, 0 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors >>> >>>>>> On Oct 10, 10:42 am, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> If there's only one record, then it shouldn't matter what your >>>>>>> range >>>>>>> step is, because Sphinx finds the smallest and largest ids >>>>>>> available - >>>>>>> which in this case, are the same number. >>> >>>>>>> Do you have all the same database indexes on your test db and >>>>>>> development db? What's the output of rake ts:in RAILS_ENV=test? >>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Pat >>> >>>>>>> On 09/10/2009, at 8:00 PM, rejeep wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> I didn't mean that I was trying to index a single record. >>>>>>>> What I >>>>>>>> meant >>>>>>>> was that I only had one record in the database for that test. >>>>>>>> So >>>>>>>> even >>>>>>>> if there would be some high index, I guess it wouldn't take to >>>>>>>> long >>>>>>>> anyway. >>> >>>>>>>> If I try with this conf: >>>>>>>> development: >>>>>>>> sql_range_step: 1000 >>>>>>>> production: >>>>>>>> sql_range_step: 1000 >>>>>>>> test: >>>>>>>> sql_range_step: 1000 >>> >>>>>>>> It's fast in development, but equally slow in test. >>> >>>>>>>> It doesn't matter if I use 1000 or 10000000 for sql_range_step. >>> >>>>>>>> On Oct 9, 5:43 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi Rejeep >>> >>>>>>>>> Sphinx doesn't allow you to process a single record - only a >>>>>>>>> full >>>>>>>>> index. Also, do you have sql_range_step set for the test >>>>>>>>> environment, >>>>>>>>> as well as the development environment? >>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Pat >>> >>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2009, at 11:53 AM, rejeep wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi! >>> >>>>>>>>>> I have a site where I want to test the search. From the >>>>>>>>>> test I >>>>>>>>>> create >>>>>>>>>> the records and then create the index. But it's so slow that >>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>> times >>>>>>>>>> out. Yes, I'm using factories and I am aware of the id >>>>>>>>>> problem. >>>>>>>>>> But >>>>>>>>>> first of all. In the test I only want to index 1 record. And >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> id of >>>>>>>>>> that usually is between 1000 - 5000. So that should not be >>>>>>>>>> such a >>>>>>>>>> big >>>>>>>>>> problem, right? And even thought I set sql_range_step, it is >>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>> slow. >>> >>>>>>>>>> Since it is super fast in development the only thing I could >>>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>> the problem was the id's. But since it's not. Does someone >>>>>>>>>> has >>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>> other suggestion? >>> >>>>>>>>>> If I skip creating any records before the indexing in the >>>>>>>>>> test. >>>>>>>>>> Then >>>>>>>>>> the indexing is fast. >>> >>> >>> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
