Hi Eric

I've just compiled 0.9.9rc2 using --enable-id64, and it works nicely  
with TS. From all reports I've heard, 0.9.9 is just as stable as  
0.9.8, so I'd recommend upgrading unless you have some key reasons not  
to.

Cheers

-- 
Pat

On 26/11/2009, at 5:01 AM, Erik Landerholm wrote:

> Pat-
>   Thanks for the repsonse.  Sorry, I didn't respond back with the  
> answer.
>
>   You are correct.  Compiling with the id64 flag did it.
>
>   I have a new laptop now with snow leopard and compiled it with the  
> 64-bit architecture flags which I assume will also accomplish the  
> same thing.  I think I threw in the id64 flag just for good measure.
>
>   I can't remember where I finally found the answer...some blog  
> probably.  But the jist is Sphinx multiples the ids by 4 or  
> something like that.  So if you have an id up near 1 billion when it  
> multiples it up it could go over the 2 ^32 maximum of an unsigned  
> int and then skip those entries.
>
> Thanks.
> Erik
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Pat Allan <p...@freelancing- 
> gods.com> wrote:
> Hi Erik
>
> First things first - can you try compiling Sphinx without the -- 
> enable-
> id64 flag, and see if that makes a difference? If that's definitely
> the cause, then I'll try doing the same on my machine, see if I can
> reproduce it.
>
> Also, can you double-check that there are no other searchd instances
> running on your machine?
>
> I realise this email's a few days late - hopefully you've found a way
> around the problem by now.
>
> --
> Pat
>
> On 20/11/2009, at 8:22 AM, erik wrote:
>
> > Oh and if i use another config file like development.sphinx.conf it
> > complains about not pid file in the log directory called
> > searchd.development.pid.  so it can read it just fine.  all the
> > searchd commands are using pid_file variable just fine, but the
> > indexer is getting another pid from somewhere.
> >
> > Erik
> >
> > On Nov 19, 1:12 pm, erik <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I can't find anyone with his problem...which is awesome.
> >>
> >> I compiled Sphinx 0.9.8.1-id64-release like this
> >> ./configure --enable-id64
> >>
> >> This is on a mac leopard.
> >>
> >> The issue i'm having is with rotate.  It doesn't matter if i do it
> >> from the command line or through thinking_sphinx.
> >>
> >> searchd starts, stops and indexes just fine.
> >>
> >> The pid file is in my working_directory/log/searchd.test.pid and it
> >> is
> >> correct and everyone can read it.
> >>
> >> Right now it has : 8766
> >> in it and nothing else
> >>
> >> When I run /usr/local/bin/indexer --config /Users/erik/work/carwoo/
> >> viper/config/test.sphinx.conf --rotate dealership_delta
> >>
> >> it prints out this:
> >>
> >> Sphinx 0.9.8.1-id64-release (r1533)
> >> Copyright (c) 2001-2008, Andrew Aksyonoff
> >>
> >> using config file '/Users/erik/work/carwoo/viper/config/
> >> test.sphinx.conf'...
> >> indexing index 'dealership_delta'...
> >> collected 0 docs, 0.0 MB
> >> collected 0 attr values
> >> sorted 0.0 Mvalues, nan% done
> >> total 0 docs, 0 bytes
> >> total 0.016 sec, 0.00 bytes/sec, 0.00 docs/sec
> >> WARNING: no process found by PID 12562.
> >> WARNING: indices NOT rotated.
> >>
> >> The PID is the wrong freaking number.  I have searched for 12562  
> all
> >> over and can not find it.  It's using the exact same config file.
> >>
> >> if i do a ps -aux | grep search i get:
> >> erik      8766   0.0  0.0   604196    284 s002  S    12:49PM
> >> 0:00.06
> >> searchd --pidfile --config /Users/erik/work/carwoo/viper_head/ 
> viper/
> >> config/test.sphinx.conf
> >>
> >> same config files and searchd is working just fine.
> >>
> >> I HAVE NO IDEA WHERE THIS ROGUE PID FILE IS BUT THIS IS DRIVING ME
> >> CRAZY!!!
> >>
> >> ok, i feel better.
> >>
> >> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> >>
> >> Erik
> >
> > --
> >
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> .
> > For more options, visit this group at 
> > http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=
> > .
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected] 
> .
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en 
> .
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Erik Landerholm
> CTO, CarWoo Inc.
> [email protected]
> 503 317 2169
>
> http://www.carwoo.com
>
> Follow us on Twitter
> http://www.twitter.com/carwoo
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected] 
> .
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en 
> .

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.


Reply via email to