Okay, I just re-issued the same gem, and updated GitHub, to fix the first of these two new issues. Still investigating the second...
-- Pat On 28/11/2009, at 11:23 PM, karmacoma wrote: > Hi Pat, > > Okay, deleting a record now works (which is great!). > However, now I suffering a slightly different problem. > > If I perform a search; Destroy one of the records within the results; > Then re-perform the search. > I now get the following error: > > === > "You have a nil object when you didn't expect it! > The error occurred while evaluating nil.local_options" > === > > With the stack trace leading me to: thinking-sphinx/lib/ > thinking_sphinx/search.rb:310:in `client'. > > Secondly, I am unable to re-index my records, as I get the following > error when I issue rake ts:index: > > === > Generating Configuration to /Users/Oliver/git/greyville/config/ > development.sphinx.conf > Sphinx 0.9.8.1-release (r1533) > Copyright (c) 2001-2008, Andrew Aksyonoff > > using config file '/Users/Oliver/git/greyville/config/ > development.sphinx.conf'... > ERROR: section 'order_core_0' (type='source') already exists in / > Users/ > Oliver/git/greyville/config/development.sphinx.conf line 75 col 1. > === > > Kind regards, Oliver. > > On 28 Nov, 11:40, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Oliver >> >> Can you give the latest release (1.3.7) a shot? It should fix this >> problem. >> >> -- >> Pat >> >> On 28/11/2009, at 8:31 PM, karmacoma wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi Pat, >> >>> I am using rails version 2.3.4. >> >>> Starting a debugger just before: thinking-sphinx/lib/ >>> thinking_sphinx/ >>> active_record.rb:83 >>> I can see the list of indexed models being gathered as script/server >>> boots up. >> >>> Then if I place a breakpoint just before: vendor/plugins/thinking- >>> sphinx/lib/thinking_sphinx.rb:63 >>> Upon hitting the first request, Thread.current >>> [:thinking_sphinx_indexed_models] returns nil. >> >>> I am using the following version of ruby in development: >>> - ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) [i686-darwin10] >> >>> And in production: >>> - ruby 1.8.6 (2007-09-24 patchlevel 111) [i486-linux] >> >>> Hope this helps... >> >>> Kind regards, Oliver Beddows. >> >>> On 28 Nov, 02:05, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi Oliver >> >>>> I'm kinda surprised by this - I thought that array was being >>>> populated >>>> at the beginning of each web request in the dev environment, but >>>> just >>>> so I can track it down... what version of Rails are you using? >> >>>> -- >>>> Pat >> >>>> On 28/11/2009, at 4:21 AM, karmacoma wrote: >> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> Using the latest version of thinking-sphinx (1.3.6). I am getting >>>>> the >>>>> following error: "undefined method `name' for nil:NilClass" when >>>>> destroying a record. >> >>>>> The stack trace leads me to the following file: thinking-sphinx/ >>>>> lib/ >>>>> thinking_sphinx/active_record.rb:229 >> >>>>> def eldest_indexed_ancestor >>>>> ancestors.reverse.detect { |ancestor| >>>>> ThinkingSphinx.indexed_models.include?(ancestor.name) >>>>> }.name >>>>> end >> >>>>> When the destroy method is called, "ThinkingSphinx.indexed_models" >>>>> returns an empty array. >> >>>>> However, according to my application it should be returning: >>>>> ["Administrator", "Article", "Customer", "Order", "Product", >>>>> "Representative"]. >> >>>>> * Within production it raises the exception every time (obviously, >>>>> as >>>>> the classes are cached). >>>>> * Within development it raises this exception on the first >>>>> invocation, >>>>> but works on the second attempt, and subsequent attempts. >> >>>>> This seems to be an issue related to lazy loading? >> >>>>> In my application I often have to delete records. So I am hoping >>>>> someone can help me fix this problem. >> >>>>> Kind regards, Oliver Beddows. >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>>>> . >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> . >>>>> For more options, visit this group >>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en >>>>> . >> >>> -- >> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>> . >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected] >>> . >>> For more options, visit this group >>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en >>> . > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en > . > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
