Hi Pat,

Here is the sql_query:

sql_query = SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE `businesses`.`id` * 1 + 0 AS `id` ,
CAST(`businesses`.`name` AS CHAR) AS `name`, CAST(GROUP_CONCAT
(DISTINCT IFNULL(`cs_categories`.`name`, '0') SEPARATOR ' ') AS CHAR)
AS `category_names`, CAST(CONCAT_WS(' ', `city`.`city`,
`city`.`state_code`) AS CHAR) AS `city`, `businesses`.`id` AS
`sphinx_internal_id`, 4054125678 AS `class_crc`, '4054125678' AS
`subclass_crcs`, 0 AS `sphinx_deleted`, IFNULL(`businesses`.`name`,
'') AS `name_sort`, GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT IFNULL(IFNULL
(`cs_categories`.`name`, ''), '0') SEPARATOR ' ') AS
`category_names_sort`, CONCAT_WS(' ', IFNULL(`city`.`city`, ''), IFNULL
(`city`.`state_code`, '')) AS `city_sort`, `businesses`.`lat` AS
`lat`, `businesses`.`lon` AS `lon` FROM `businesses`    LEFT OUTER
JOIN `categorizations` ON (`businesses`.`id` =
`categorizations`.`business_id`)  LEFT OUTER JOIN `cs_categories` ON
(`cs_categories`.`id` = `categorizations`.`cs_category_id`)   LEFT
OUTER JOIN `city` ON `city`.city_id = `businesses`.city_id  WHERE
`businesses`.`id` >= $start AND `businesses`.`id` <= $end GROUP BY
`businesses`.`id`  ORDER BY NULL
  sql_query_range = SELECT IFNULL(MIN(`id`), 1), IFNULL(MAX(`id`), 1)
FROM `businesses`

We turned on logging for every query in mysqld to troubleshoot this.
This is the last query run:

SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE `businesses`.`id` * 1 + 0 AS `id` , CAST
(`businesses`.`name` AS CHAR) AS `name`, CAST(GROUP
_CONCAT(DISTINCT IFNULL(`cs_categories`.`name`, '0') SEPARATOR ' ') AS
CHAR) AS `category_names`, CAST(CONCAT_WS(' ', `city`.`city`,
`city`.`state_code`) AS CHAR) AS `city`, `businesses`.`id` AS
`sphinx_internal_id`, 4054125678 AS `class_crc`, '4054125678' AS
`subclass_crcs`, 0 AS `sphinx_deleted`, IFNULL(`businesses`.`name`,
'') AS `name_sort`, GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT IFNULL(IFNULL
(`cs_categories`.`name`, ''), '0') SEPARATOR ' ') AS
`category_names_sort`, CONCAT_WS(' ', IFNULL(`city`.`city`, ''), IFNULL
(`city`.`state_code`, '')) AS `city_sort`, `businesses`.`lat` AS
`lat`, `businesses`.`lon` AS `lon` FROM `businesses`    LEFT OUTER
JOIN `categorizations` ON (`businesses`.`id` =
`categorizations`.`business_id`)  LEFT OUTER JOIN `cs_categories` ON
(`cs_categories`.`id` = `categorizations`.`cs_category_id`)   LEFT
OUTER JOIN `city` ON `city`.city_id = `businesses`.city_id  WHERE
`businesses`.`id` >= 2365000001 AND `businesses`.`id` <= 2365744349
GROUP BY `businesses`.`id`  ORDER BY NULL

Which returns zero rows.  In fact, the last 15+ queries return zero
rows.  The businesses table has no records with ids
2034010806...2500480805.  And of course, the maximum id is
15250646237.  We need *all* the rows indexed, of course...  :)

So should we be increasing the step_size to like 10 million?

-Steve

On Dec 14, 2:58 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Steve
>
> Thinking Sphinx uses left outer joins (because that's what ActiveRecord uses, 
> and it's the best fit in this situation), and yes, one doc is one row.
>
> There's nothing odd in your index definition - so let's have a look at the 
> sql_query value of the source business_core_0, in 
> config/development.sphinx.conf (or production - they should be the same). You 
> should be able to run it manually, see if it returns the right results 
> (perhaps over a particular step, to keep things reasonably fast and 
> manageable).
>
> --
> Pat
>
> On 15/12/2009, at 3:26 AM, Steve H wrote:
>
>
>
> > Thanks for the lightning-fast reply Pat.  :)
>
> >  define_index do
> >    indexes :name, :sortable => true
> >    indexes categories_and_tags(:name), :as
> > => :category_names, :sortable => true
> >    indexes [city.city, city.state_code], :as => :city, :sortable =>
> > true
> >    set_property :group_concat_max_len => 8192
> >    # attributes
> >    has lat, lon
> >  end
>
> > Every business has at least one category or tag, but I'm kind of
> > assuming here that the indexer is doing a full left join (ie, not an
> > inner join).
>
> > Could something in this block be causing the problem?  And is 1 doc =
> > 1 row in the db?
>
> > -Steve
>
> > On Dec 13, 7:03 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Hi Steve
>
> >> What does your define_index block for Business look like?
>
> >> --
> >> Pat
>
> >> On 14/12/2009, at 1:44 PM, Steve H wrote:
>
> >>> OK first off -- I'm not 100% certain that 1 doc = 1 record.  But if it
> >>> DOES then, sphinx definitely didn't collect enough.  We have over 13
> >>> million rows in our database, but this was the output after indexing:
>
> >>> -----------------------------------------------
> >>> indexing index 'business_core'...
> >>> collected 1199 docs, 0.7 MB
> >>> collected 0 attr values
> >>> sorted 0.0 Mvalues, 100.0% done
> >>> sorted 0.1 Mhits, 100.0% done
> >>> total 1199 docs, 685923 bytes
> >>> total 1381.345 sec, 496.56 bytes/sec, 0.87 docs/sec
> >>> distributed index 'business' can not be directly indexed; skipping.
> >>> Started successfully (pid 32011).
> >>> -----------------------------------------------
>
> >>> After reading some of the docs, I thought... maybe I have to increase
> >>> the sql_range_step in the sphinx.yml or increase the
> >>> group_concat_max_len property.  So I did those things, but the output
> >>> after indexing is the same (albeit much much faster  :)
>
> >>> -----------------------------------------------
> >>> Stopped search daemon (pid 2810).
> >>> Generating Configuration to /home/steve/insiderpages/config/
> >>> sphinx_dev.sphinx.conf
> >>> Sphinx 0.9.8.1-release (r1533)
> >>> Copyright (c) 2001-2008, Andrew Aksyonoff
>
> >>> using config file '/home/steve/insiderpages/config/
> >>> sphinx_dev.sphinx.conf'...
> >>> indexing index 'business_core'...
> >>> collected 1199 docs, 0.1 MB
> >>> collected 0 attr values
> >>> sorted 0.0 Mvalues, 100.0% done
> >>> sorted 0.0 Mhits, 100.0% done
> >>> total 1199 docs, 79605 bytes
> >>> total 0.447 sec, 177901.38 bytes/sec, 2679.53 docs/sec
> >>> distributed index 'business' can not be directly indexed; skipping.
> >>> Started successfully (pid 6365).
> >>> -----------------------------------------------
>
> >>> What's the problem?
>
> >>> -Steve
>
> >>> PS:
> >>> mysql> select count(id) from businesses;
> >>> +-----------+
> >>> | count(id) |
> >>> +-----------+
> >>> |  13395683 |
> >>> +-----------+
> >>> 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
>
> >>> mysql> select max(id) from businesses;
> >>> +-------------+
> >>> | max(id)     |
> >>> +-------------+
> >>> | 15250646126 |
> >>> +-------------+
> >>> 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
>
> >>> --
>
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> >>> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >>> [email protected].
> >>> For more options, visit this group 
> >>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>
> > --
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.


Reply via email to