I've tried Sphinx 0.9.9 and ts-99 before, but the delayed_job indexer weren't work.
Was there any bug fixed on delayed_job recently? On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > You caught me at a good time, and the problem isn't too complex. > > It looks like you're using Sphinx 0.9.8 - if you want to use 64bit integers, > you'll need to use Sphinx 0.9.9 instead - try that, and Thinking > Sphinx/Riddle should automatically play nicely with filters using integers > greater than 2^32. > > If I'm wrong, let me know and we can investigate further :) > > -- > Pat > > On 28/12/2009, at 5:08 PM, Nugroho Herucahyono wrote: > >> Hi Pat, >> >> Thanks for the extremely quick response :) >> >> it's integer >> >> this is the trace >> >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/riddle-1.0.8/lib/riddle/client/message.rb:26:in >> `pack' >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/riddle-1.0.8/lib/riddle/client/message.rb:26:in >> `append_int' >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/riddle-1.0.8/lib/riddle/client/message.rb:44:in >> `append_ints' >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/riddle-1.0.8/lib/riddle/client/message.rb:44:in >> `each' >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/riddle-1.0.8/lib/riddle/client/message.rb:44:in >> `append_ints' >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/riddle-1.0.8/lib/riddle/client/filter.rb:43:in >> `append_integer_range' >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/riddle-1.0.8/lib/riddle/client/filter.rb:28:in >> `query_message' >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/riddle-1.0.8/lib/riddle/client.rb:613:in >> `query_message' >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/riddle-1.0.8/lib/riddle/client.rb:613:in `each' >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/riddle-1.0.8/lib/riddle/client.rb:613:in >> `query_message' >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/riddle-1.0.8/lib/riddle/client.rb:309:in `query' >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/thinking-sphinx-1.3.14/lib/thinking_sphinx/search.rb:258:in >> `populate' >> /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/benchmark.rb:308:in `realtime' >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/thinking-sphinx-1.3.14/lib/thinking_sphinx/search.rb:257:in >> `populate' >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/thinking-sphinx-1.3.14/lib/thinking_sphinx/search.rb:380:in >> `call' >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/thinking-sphinx-1.3.14/lib/thinking_sphinx/search.rb:380:in >> `retry_on_stale_index' >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/thinking-sphinx-1.3.14/lib/thinking_sphinx/search.rb:254:in >> `populate' >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/thinking-sphinx-1.3.14/lib/thinking_sphinx/search.rb:173:in >> `total_pages' >> >> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Nugroho >>> >>> What's the data type of the attribute you're filtering on - float, or >>> integer? >>> >>> If it's a float, make sure you're passing in floats to the range, instead >>> of integers. If it's an integer, then let me know what the stacktrace is, >>> although there might be an upper limit of 2^32. >>> >>> -- >>> Pat >>> >> >> -- >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Thinking Sphinx" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. >> >> > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Thinking Sphinx" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
