Ok, i've upgraded, and now I've added the two index names (index_name 'prefix index') to the define_index statements... here's the response:
ERROR: section 'library_core_0' (type='source') already exists [...] On Dec 29, 4:24 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi David > > If there's no ts:version task, then I think you're using a really old version > of TS. It's definitely worth trying to upgrade, see if that helps matters. > > -- > Pat > > On 30/12/2009, at 5:14 AM, David Aronchick wrote: > > > Hi-- > > > In truth, I'm not sure - the gemspec says 0.9.9, but rake ts:version > > fails (Don't know how to build task 'thinking_sphinx:version'). > > > The rest of my define index is very standard: > > > define_index do > > #indexed fields, fields to be added to the full text index > > indexes :name, :sortable => true > > indexes aliases(:alias), :as => :aliases > > > #attributes (fields to be sorted by, or grouped by) > > has [field names], :as => [aliases] x 20 > > > set_property :min_prefix_len => 1 > > > #used to determine if the index has been rebuilt recently > > has "UNIX_TIMESTAMP()", :as => :index_time > > end > > > On Dec 28, 8:38 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi David > > >> What version of TS are you currently using? 1.3.6 was when multiple index > >> support was added, but I'd recommend using the latest (1.3.14). Also, > >> what's the full contents of your define_index block? > > >> -- > >> Pat > > >> On 29/12/2009, at 3:18 PM, David Aronchick wrote: > > >>> I've been trying to get Thinking Sphinx for Ruby to handle prefixes > >>> and/or star, and every time i generate a new configuration file, it > >>> seems to ignore it. > > >>> Here's the line I added: > > >>> define_index do > >>> [... Stuff ...] > >>> set_property :min_prefix_len => 1 > >>> end > > >>> And then I run: > > >>> rake ts:config > >>> rake ts:in > >>> rake ts:run > > >>> And nothing new. I keep checking the config file, and it never changes > >>> due to this. I even manually go in and change the file, and then in is > >>> replaced with a file without anything relating to min_prefix. Any > >>> thoughts? > > >>> ----- > > >>> As an aside, what version of thinking sphinx now allows multiple > >>> indexes against a single table? I'd like to have one index with > >>> min_prefix_len on, and one without. > > >>> -- > > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >>> "Thinking Sphinx" group. > >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>> [email protected]. > >>> For more options, visit this group > >>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Thinking Sphinx" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
