cool! . i think that will solve my problem. regards, madhu
On Feb 18, 8:37 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > Yup, multiple indexes are in the current version of TS... > > define_index "foo" do > # ... > end > > Names are required, otherwise you'll get Sphinx complaining about multiple > indexes all with the same name. > > -- > Pat > > On 19/02/2010, at 1:32 PM, madhu wrote: > > > no problem pat. TS is wonderful as it is. > > > just spotted this post in the forum( > >http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx/browse_thread/thread/8... > > ). > > > This will solve my need for having distributed index. R these changes > > live like you mentioned in the post ? > > > Thank you for all the help. > > > PS: i will keep thinking about the syntax and i will definitely > > communicate with you if i come-up with something. > > > regards > > madhu > > > On Feb 18, 12:12 am, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Unfortunately, TS does not support distributed indexes... I would like to, > >> but it hasn't been a priority, and I'm not sure what the syntax would look > >> like. Any suggestions on how it should be implemented are welcome. > > >> -- > >> Pat > > >> On 18/02/2010, at 10:19 AM, madhu wrote: > > >>> hi pat, > > >>> I have sent my previous message to you by clicking on 'reply to > >>> author' instead of posting here. Sorry about the spam. > > >>> in short, the suggestion i got from 'sphinx forum' is to use > >>> distributed indexing. Does TS support distributed indexing ? > > >>> tx > >>> madhu > > >>> On Feb 17, 12:52 pm, madhu <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> hello pat, > > >>>> Thank you very much for the quick response. I will check the same with > >>>> sphinx group as well. I am trying to simplify the complex query > >>>> structure. When i reduce max_match to :1000, i could save about > >>>> 50-100ms. > > >>>> regards > >>>> madhu > > >>>> On Feb 17, 12:38 am, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>> Hi Madhu > > >>>>> I've never dealt with a Sphinx index of that size, so I'm not sure what > >>>>> the best approach is. I recommend you ask this same question on the > >>>>> Sphinx Forum, see if the people there can > >>>>> help.http://www.sphinxsearch.com/forum/ > > >>>>> Also, you may want to look into the following > >>>>> setting:http://www.sphinxsearch.com/docs/manual-0.9.9.html#conf-preopen > > >>>>> It's also worth noting that queries get slower the more complex they > >>>>> are, and your previous email was in a thread with a complex query you > >>>>> wanted... if there's any way of simplifying that, then that should help > >>>>> speeds too. Having an explicit max_matches much higher than 1000 also > >>>>> keeps Sphinx running a bit slower. > > >>>>> Hope this is somewhat helpful. > > >>>>> Cheers > > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Pat > > >>>>> On 17/02/2010, at 3:35 PM, madhu wrote: > > >>>>>> Is there anyperformancetuning parameters for sphinx. I am using the > >>>>>> following values in my sphinx.yml: > >>>>>> mem_limit: 256M > >>>>>> read_buffer: 2M > >>>>>> Is there any other things i can tune to improve theperformance? > > >>>>>> I have 10 million records and my sphinx index folder is about 2.5gb. > >>>>>> and using "extended" search queries with max_matches: 2000. Its taking > >>>>>> almost 1.5 seconds for one search query in sphinx. The average DB > >>>>>> response time is 20 - 100ms. I want to reduce sphinx delay to 500ms or > >>>>>> less. Is it possible ? > > >>>>>> Other thing I observed is though the index size is 2.5gb, searchd only > >>>>>> occupies 500mb of RAM when started. then when the queries are running, > >>>>>> the memory usage goes between 500mb and 700mb. Is there a way to load > >>>>>> entire index to memory so that i can completely eliminate the IO > >>>>>> reads ?(I have enough RAM) > > >>>>>> I am running sphinx server in one machine, DB in another machine and > >>>>>> Web-Server on a third machine. > > >>>>>> appreciate any help. > > >>>>>> tx > >>>>>> madhu > > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>>>>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. > >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>>>>> [email protected]. > >>>>>> For more options, visit this group > >>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > > >>> -- > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >>> "Thinking Sphinx" group. > >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>> [email protected]. > >>> For more options, visit this group > >>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Thinking Sphinx" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
