I tried to setup my code the way I had it before. When it was still
all null I realised that it obviously wasn't indexing despite what it
was saying.
One reboot later and it all seems to be working :)

Thanks for your time and patience guys.

Regards,

Colin

On Feb 22, 11:46 pm, Colin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here you go:http://pastie.org/837827
>
> On Feb 22, 11:41 pm, Aaron Brethorst <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Can you perform a ts:index and dump the output into a pastie?
>
> > On Feb 22, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Colin wrote:
>
> > > Should that would work as the only place is_active is defined is the
> > > line where Aaron suggested to try it?
>
> > > Either way, no it doesn't. Still empty.
>
> > > On Feb 22, 11:32 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> Does a normal search using the attribute work?
>
> > >>   Calendar.search :with => {:is_active => true}
>
> > >> --
> > >> Pat
>
> > >> On 23/02/2010, at 10:24 AM, Colin wrote:
>
> > >>> pastie updated to show whole class:http://pastie.org/837509
>
> > >>> define_index do
> > >>>    indexes id
> > >>>    indexes subject
> > >>>    indexes parties
>
> > >>>    set_property :enable_star => 1
> > >>>    set_property :min_infix_len => 3
>
> > >>>    has organisation_id
> > >>>    has "deleted_at IS NULL", :as => :is_active, :type => :boolean
> > >>>  end
>
> > >>> Yep, just stopped, reindexed and restarted there again. Still empty.
>
> > >>> On Feb 22, 11:21 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>> What Aaron's been saying has been spot on.
>
> > >>>> Colin: can you paste your define_index block here, as it currently 
> > >>>> stands? And also, have you restarted Sphinx and re-indexed? An empty 
> > >>>> array would suggest Sphinx doesn't know about the new attribute you've 
> > >>>> created.
>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Pat
>
> > >>>> On 23/02/2010, at 9:59 AM, Aaron Brethorst wrote:
>
> > >>>>> and your sphinx_scope was defined identically to this?
>
> > >>>>> sphinx_scope(:active_ts) {
> > >>>>>   { :with => {:is_active => true} }
> > >>>>> }
>
> > >>>>> that should work, but i'm no expert unfortunately.
>
> > >>>>> On Feb 22, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Colin wrote:
>
> > >>>>>> Just to add in the "has "deleted_at IS NULL", :as => :is_active, 
> > >>>>>> :type
> > >>>>>> => :boolean" line.
>
> > >>>>>> On Feb 22, 10:52 pm, Aaron Brethorst <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> did you modify the define_index block?
>
> > >>>>>>> On Feb 22, 2010, at 2:48 PM, Colin wrote:
>
> > >>>>>>>> I tried your suggestion and also tried replacing the { :conditions 
> > >>>>>>>> =>
> > >>>>>>>> ["deleted_at IS NULL"] } with {:conditions => {:deleted_at => nil}}
> > >>>>>>>> but in both cases it seems to be returning an empty array.
>
> > >>>>>>>> On Feb 22, 10:34 pm, Aaron Brethorst <[email protected]> 
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> Pat could certainly speak to this better than I, but I was under 
> > >>>>>>>>> the impression that conditions are only used in conjunction with 
> > >>>>>>>>> fields that have been marked with 'indexes'.
>
> > >>>>>>>>> I was actually doing something similar to what you're trying to 
> > >>>>>>>>> accomplish earlier today. Maybe you could do something like the 
> > >>>>>>>>> following:
>
> > >>>>>>>>> # note: untested code; written in my Mail app
>
> > >>>>>>>>> define_index do
> > >>>>>>>>>   # all of your existing stuff goes here
> > >>>>>>>>>   has "deleted_at IS NULL", :as => :is_active, :type => :boolean
> > >>>>>>>>> end
>
> > >>>>>>>>> sphinx_scope(:active_ts) {
> > >>>>>>>>>   { :with => {:is_active => true} }
>
> > >>>>>>>>> }
>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Feb 22, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Colin wrote:
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Thank you for the link.
> > >>>>>>>>>> It fixed the original error but it is now throwing:
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> undefined method `keys' for ["deleted_at IS NULL"]
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> So would I be right in thinking that I can't use the 
> > >>>>>>>>>> ["deleted_at IS
> > >>>>>>>>>> NULL"] syntax to define a condition?
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Colin
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Feb 22, 8:50 pm, Aaron Brethorst <[email protected]> 
> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Try declaring your sphinx_scopes after define_index.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>http://brethorsting.com/blog/2010/02/solution-for-undefined-method-sp...
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 22, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Colin wrote:
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm getting the above error when I try to declare a 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> sphinx_scope.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I've googled around but couldn't find a solution.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The model in question can be found 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> here:http://pastie.org/837509
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I've tried it in the syntax shown above and also a direct copy 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> of the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> named_scope syntax.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Any ideas?
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Colin
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> > >>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> > >>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
> > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
> > >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
> > >>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group 
> > >>>>>>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > >>>>>>>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> > >>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
> > >>>>>>>> [email protected].
> > >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > >>>>>>>> [email protected].
> > >>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group 
> > >>>>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > >>>>>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> > >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
> > >>>>>> [email protected].
> > >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > >>>>>> [email protected].
> > >>>>>> For more options, visit this group 
> > >>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > >>>>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> > >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > >>>>> [email protected].
> > >>>>> For more options, visit this group 
> > >>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>
> > >>> --
> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > >>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> > >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > >>> [email protected].
> > >>> For more options, visit this group 
> > >>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > > "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > > [email protected].
> > > For more options, visit this group 
> > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.

Reply via email to