It's worth noting that this has now changed - you'll want to set the models in 
sphinx.yml instead:

  development:
    indexed_models:
    - ModelOne
    - ModelTwo

This is committed and pushed to GitHub, but not in a new gem release yet. It 
definitely works better than the previous approach, though. Have been 
discussing it with Marcelo off-list, and he's confirmed it works well :)

-- 
Pat

On 07/06/2010, at 6:36 AM, def wrote:

> Thanks for fast reply, I will play with that tomorrow :)
> hope it will helps, have nice day
> 
> On 5 Чер, 08:24, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Okay, just pushed 1.3.17 - you'll want to add something like the following 
>> to the end of your environment.rb - before any references to any of your 
>> models, but after the configure block:
>> 
>>   ThinkingSphinx.indexed_models = ['ModelOne', 'ModelTwo']
>> 
>> Having the model names as strings, not actual models, is important - if you 
>> use actual models, then that evaluates the define_index block within the 
>> model, which fires off TS's default handling of model loading.
>> 
>> Give it a go, hopefully it helps matters.
>> 
>> Also, for the record: there's no old versions that are fast at loading 
>> models - it's important for TS to know about all models that are available 
>> for searching.
>> 
>> --
>> Pat
>> 
>> On 05/06/2010, at 4:37 AM, def wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Hi Pat,
>> 
>>> can you advise version that doesn't do this overhead? It become quite
>>> hard to work on development.
>>> I hope you can make this improvement in short time :)
>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> Def
>> 
>>> On Jun 3, 9:05 am, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hi Marcelo
>> 
>>>> At this point, there's no way to tell TS exactly which models to load. 
>>>> You're not the first to request it, though, so I'll try to get something 
>>>> into the code which does that.
>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Pat
>> 
>>>> On 03/06/2010, at 6:46 AM, Marcelo Barbudas wrote:
>> 
>>>>> Hi Pat,
>> 
>>>>> Sorry to be answering so late.
>> 
>>>>> I am using the latest github version.
>> 
>>>>> This happens only in development mode right? Is there a way to
>>>>> explicitly tell TS what to load so I can benchmark without ts being a
>>>>> factor?
>> 
>>>>> Or to specify the models manually to avoid the extra CPU burn?
>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> M.
>> 
>>>>> On Jun 1, 10:31 am, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Marcelo
>> 
>>>>>> How many models do you have in your application?
>> 
>>>>>> To process search results, TS needs to know about *all* models that have 
>>>>>> indexes, so it forces Rails to load every single model. Unfortunately 
>>>>>> this can't be avoided, but it should only happen (with the latest 
>>>>>> version of TS) when you're running a search.
>> 
>>>>>> So: what version of TS are you using?
>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Pat
>> 
>>>>>> On 01/06/2010, at 5:23 AM, Marcelo Barbudas wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>> Hi.
>> 
>>>>>>> I've been profiling a Rails Application and noticed some big
>>>>>>> improvements once I disable TS.
>> 
>>>>>>> Basically if I have a model called Post which has some indexes.
>>>>>>> Once I remove define_index,  in any method that uses Post, even in
>>>>>>> basic Post.find without any TS interaction, I get 4x improvements.
>> 
>>>>>>> I am using Rails 2.3.5 in development mode, testing via the NewRelic
>>>>>>> plugin.
>> 
>>>>>>> Any ideas? I don't even know what data to include.
>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> M.
>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group 
>>>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group 
>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group 
>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.

Reply via email to