Thanks...5 seconds should be quick enough. I suppose the upside to this is that I can keep my indexes on the local machine.
Will let you know if I run into any problems. On Jun 29, 7:48 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > In Delayed Job 1.8.5, it looks it checks for jobs every 5 seconds, but you > can change that: > > Delayed::Worker.sleep_delay = 2 > > I assume it's the same in the 2.x releases (when I last checked, I don't > think the code had changed that dramatically). > > -- > Pat > > On 30/06/2010, at 12:41 PM, gmoniey wrote: > > > > > I see...I guess my only option is to go with delayed jobs. From what I > > have read in the docs, the delayed_delta job is a long living process > > which periodically checks for delta objects. Do you have any details > > on how often it wakes up and processes deltas? Is possible to set this > > field? > > > Thanks. > > > arash > > > On Jun 29, 6:35 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yup, that's exactly the problem you'd be facing. > > >> -- > >> Pat > > >> On 30/06/2010, at 11:30 AM, gmoniey wrote: > > >>> Hi Pat, > > >>> Thanks for responding. I would like to stay away from delayed deltas > >>> as we need items to be added to the indexes in realtime. If the index > >>> files are accessible by all servers, is the issue then contention over > >>> the same files when attempting to update the deltas? > > >>> On Jun 29, 5:55 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> When you're dealing with multiple servers, the best delta approach is > >>>> delayed deltas - and so you have the delayed job queue running on the > >>>> same machine that your index files (and probably searchd) are located on. > > >>>> That way, all the Sphinx files and processes are in one place, and delta > >>>> requests get put into the database, and then are handled by the queue. > > >>>> -- > >>>> Pat > > >>>> On 30/06/2010, at 10:45 AM, gmoniey wrote: > > >>>>> I'm transitioning my app to a multiple server setup, and I am trying > >>>>> to figure out what the best approach is. From what I gather, the > >>>>> following should be fine: > > >>>>> 1. Run searchd on 1 machine, and have it point to indexes on a nas > >>>>> (which is accesible by all machines) > >>>>> 2. Point other machines to the 1 searchd instance. > > >>>>> My concern/confusion is with deltas; from what I have read on the > >>>>> other posts, the delta indexing may fail, but I'm not quite sure why. > >>>>> Is it that multiple apps may be trying to write to the same files on > >>>>> the nas? > > >>>>> -- > >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>>>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. > >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>>>> [email protected]. > >>>>> For more options, visit this group > >>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > > >>> -- > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >>> "Thinking Sphinx" group. > >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>> [email protected]. > >>> For more options, visit this group > >>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Thinking Sphinx" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
