What happens if you comment out the observers line in production.rb? And does 
the issue happen in the dev environment as well?

-- 
Pat

On 08/07/2010, at 6:06 PM, milan wrote:

> Pat,
> 
> I tried 1.3.17 but with the same result as with 1.3.18 (i.e. almost
> empty config file is generated).
> Here is my environment.rb file: https://gist.github.com/5fd3260816e0771ece66
> and my production.rb file here: https://gist.github.com/00fda09b20184495e672
> I don't think there's anything interesting there, though.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> On Jul 7, 5:13 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Right, nothing out of the ordinary there. Can you try 1.3.17? I think there 
>> was a bug in earlier versions before that with models being invoked twice 
>> and thus indexes being duplicated. Which is the complete opposite to your 
>> current problem with 1.3.18, but I wonder if it's a similar cause... ie: 
>> something with how models are being loaded...
>> 
>> Can you share your environment.rb and production.rb files? Perhaps in a gist?
>> 
>> (I'm not going to be so prompt with my next response - it's past 1am here, 
>> time for sleep ;)
>> 
>> --
>> Pat
>> 
>> On 08/07/2010, at 1:10 AM, milan wrote:
>> 
>>> Here we go:
>> 
>>>  define_index do
>>>    indexes subject, :sortable => true
>>>    indexes [contact.last_name, contact.first_name], :as
>>> => :contact_full_name, :sortable => true
>>>    indexes [owner.last_name, owner.first_name], :as
>>> => :owner_full_name, :sortable => true
>>>    indexes start_date
>>>    indexes start_time
>>>    indexes status
>>>    indexes description
>>>    indexes actable.name, :as => :actable_name
>>>    indexes result
>>>    indexes owner_id
>>>    has owner_id, actable_id
>>>    set_property :field_weights => {"subject" => 100,
>>> "contact_full_name" => 90, "description" => 80 }
>>>    set_property :delta => true
>>>  end
>> 
>>> My previous version was 1.1.6
>> 
>>> On Jul 7, 4:59 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hmm... let's take a look at your Activity define_index block. Also: which 
>>>> version of TS have you dropped back to? 1.3.17? Or something earlier?
>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Pat
>> 
>>>> On 08/07/2010, at 12:15 AM, milan wrote:
>> 
>>>>> Hi Pat,
>> 
>>>>> thanks for the hint Pat, I tried to run the task on an older branch
>>>>> and what I'm getting now is this: the configuration runs OK, but then
>>>>> when I'm trying to run the rake:index task I'm getting this:
>> 
>>>>> ERROR: section 'activity_delta_0' (type='source') already exists in /
>>>>> Users/milan/Projects/honeybee/config/production.sphinx.conf line 231
>>>>> col 25.
>>>>> FATAL: failed to parse config file '/Users/milan/Projects/honeybee/
>>>>> config/production.sphinx.conf'
>> 
>>>>> I don't think there's anything special about my indexes (they used to
>>>>> work smoothly - I don't remember changing anything). The only special
>>>>> thing about this particular model is that it's a STI model.
>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Milan
>> 
>>>>> On Jul 7, 3:42 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Milan
>> 
>>>>>> What version were you running previously? If it wasn't 1.3.17, can you 
>>>>>> try dropping down to that and see if the problem still occurs?
>> 
>>>>>> Also: what version of Rails are you running? Do you have anything 
>>>>>> particularly complex happening in your indexes, or in the server setup? 
>>>>>> Are you doing anything out of the ordinary with model loading?
>> 
>>>>>> Cheers
>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Pat
>> 
>>>>>> On 07/07/2010, at 11:05 PM, milan wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>> Hey everyone,
>> 
>>>>>>> I just upgraded to version 1.3.18 (using gem) and the configuration
>>>>>>> rake task doesn't seem to work properly. After I run rake ts:conf all
>>>>>>> I get is this (in config/production.sphinx.conf):
>> 
>>>>>>> indexer
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> }
>> 
>>>>>>> searchd
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>  listen = 127.0.0.1:9312
>>>>>>>  log = /Users/milan/Projects/honeybee/log/searchd.log
>>>>>>>  query_log = /Users/milan/Projects/honeybee/log/searchd.query.log
>>>>>>>  pid_file = /home/honeybee/production/shared/pids/searchd.pid
>>>>>>> }
>> 
>>>>>>> Obviously, there's something missing here.
>>>>>>> Any ideas what might've gone wrong?
>>>>>>> (I'm using Sphinx 0.9.9-release (r2117)
>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>> Milan
>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group 
>>>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group 
>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group 
>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.

Reply via email to