kshipley wrote: > Has anyone patched around this issue? Is there a mechanism to get > faceted results that doesn't go through the offending populate method?
I've had similar issues and came up with the patch at [1]. Performance still isn't great, but it's better. I'd be interested to hear if it helps in your situation. -- James Healy <[email protected]> Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:51:05 +1000 [1] http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx/browse_thread/thread/5037a3882e5c47b2/3b073b09c147e085?lnk=gst&q=james+healy#3b073b09c147e085 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
