It looks like the first ~32K records in the database don't have
timestamps. Not sure what that would be, perhaps the timestamp fields
were added later, but that seems a bit odd.
As for the remainder of your questions, I'll do a little forensics on
this tomorrow and get back to you.
Thanks again,
-Jeff
On 10/14/10 10:22 PM, Pat Allan wrote:
The only thing I'd be interested to know at this point is whether that
timestamp column is NULL at all - and whether the results that don't make it
through are all set to NULL? Or any other distinction in the timestamp values
tied to what is/isn't in the Sphinx index.
Cheers
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking
Sphinx" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.