Apologies for the belated response, but thanks Pat! -- I spotted the updated gem yesterday, and it's working fine for me with Rails 3.0.3 on my production site.
-Steve Pat Allan <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Andrei, Steve, everyone. > > 2.0.1 of TS should be playing nicely with Rails 3.0.3 - although I've > not made any changes to indexing for a while now, so I don't know why > that would be behaving any differently. I don't have any large > datasets on my machine, so it's hard for me to tell if there's > actually any difference. > > Cheers > > -- > Pat > > On 18/11/2010, at 1:06 AM, Andrei wrote: > >> Also, if i may add, the rake task now reports its progress only after >> it had finished working. >> Previous behavior was more useful in my opinion. Helped with the >> debugging. >> >> Thanks. >> >> On Nov 16, 11:23 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Yup, will just hold out for a little bit to ensure there's no other >>> problems (also: Rails 3.0.3 is due very soon (if it's not released >>> already), apparently 3.0.2 is buggy). >>> >>> Bundler makes it pretty easy to have people switch to git over gems when >>> needed :) >>> >>> -- >>> Pat >>> >>> On 17/11/2010, at 7:32 AM, Steve Purcell wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Just came across this too, having updated to both 2.0.0 and 3.0.2 today. >>> >>>> The fix works nicely... might there be a 2.0.1 gem in due course? >>> >>>> -Steve >>> >>>> Pat Allan <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>>> Hi Andrei >>> >>>>> I've just patched this (with some great help from Ivan Ukhov) - if you >>>>> use git instead of the 2.0.0 gem, it should work fine. Let me know if I'm >>>>> wrong. >>> >>>>> Cheers >>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Pat >>> >>>>> On 16/11/2010, at 10:34 PM, Andrei wrote: >>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> with rails 3.0.2 TS will not generate the configuration file. >>> >>>>>> rake aborts with an error: >>>>>> undefined method `with_join_class' for >>>>>> #<ActiveRecord::Associations::ClassMethods::JoinDependency::JoinAssociation >>>>>> : >>>>>> 0x00000019e6cad0> >>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group >>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. >>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>> "Thinking Sphinx" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit this group >>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Thinking Sphinx" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
