Hi Pat,

It works absolutely fine with store_id <=999. Is there anything that
change the configurations for this.
Because i need to fix this immediately on the production server. Later
will upgrade the latest version.


On Dec 15, 11:14 am, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi there
>
> Either you're using a *really* old version of Thinking Sphinx (ie: about 3 
> years old), or you've just been reading really old documentation. The index 
> definition should look more like this:
>
>   define_index do
>     indexes status
>     indexes buyer_notes
>     indexes rsm
>     indexes [customer.first_name, customer.middle_name, customer.last_name], 
> :as => :customer_full_name
>     indexes [items.ship_to_first_name, items.ship_to_middle_name, 
> items.ship_to_last_name], :as => :ship_to_full_name
>     indexes items.ship_to_company, :as => :ship_to_company
>     indexes items.ship_to_state, :as => :ship_to_state
>
>     has store_order_id
>     has store_id
>     has customer.store_customer_id, :as => :store_customer_id
>   end
>
> You'll notice here I've separated the obviously non-text data into attributes 
> (the 'has' method), while I've kept everything else as fields. This is far 
> better for doing exact integer matches on integers, instead of relying on 
> Sphinx's text matching algorithms - which are built with a different purpose 
> in mind.
>
> With all this changed, then your search request becomes the following:
>
>   Order.search(
>     :with     => {:store_order_id => 2100, :store_id => 1047},
>     :include  => [:customer, :items, :batch],
>     :per_page => 10
>   )
>
> You'll see here that :conditions has become :with - this is because :with is 
> for attribute filters, whereas :conditions is for searching on specific 
> fields. If that's not too clear, have a read of the following 
> documentation:http://freelancing-god.github.com/ts/en/sphinx_basics.html
>
> And if you are using a really old version of Thinking Sphinx, I highly 
> recommend upgrading to something recent - 1.4.0 for Rails 1.2 or Rails 2, or 
> 2.0.0 for Rails 3.0.0 and 2.0.1 for Rails 3.0.3.
>
> Hopefully this helps a bit :)
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> Pat
>
> On 15/12/2010, at 4:19 PM, raghu wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I am having problem in searching the results.
> > If the foreign key store_id in the orders table is greater than
> > 999, then returns the empty results. But it returns the correct result
> > set
> > when the its <=999.
>
> > How to make it working when the store_id is greater than 999?
>
> > Indexes of the order model
>
> > class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
>
> >    define_index do |index|
> >    index.includes.store_order_id
> >    index.includes.status
> >    index.includes.buyer_notes
> >    index.includes.rsm
> >    index.includes.store_id
> >    index.includes.customer.store_customer_id
>
> > index.includes.customer(:first_name,:middle_name,:last_name).as.customer_full_name
>
> > index.includes.items(:ship_to_first_name,:ship_to_middle_name,:ship_to_last_name).as.ship_to_full_name
> >    index.includes.items.ship_to_company
> >    index.includes.items.ship_to_state
> >  end
>
> > end
>
> > Search Query
>
> > orders = Order.search(:conditions => {store_order_id=>2100, :store_id
> > => 1047}, :include => [:customer,:items,:batch], :per_page => 10)
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.

Reply via email to