> Now that there's the release of Sphinx 2.0.1-beta, it looks like we can get > some better string facet support happening, as has already been discussed on > this list between Clemens Kofler and myself. With a bit of luck, Clemens and > I will have some time while we're in the same city to pair program and allow > TS to degrade gracefully to the existing solution for those not using Sphinx > 2.0.1.
I just checked and only single valued string attributes are supported in Sphinx 2.0.1-beta. So having separate SQL tables for the terms is still necessary. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
