The error seemed to indicate there was maybe a problem with the position of the attribute, perhaps compared to the same attribute in other indices? I've not seen it before, mind you. Does searching the Sphinx forum turn up anything?
And is it worth trying Sphinx 2.0.x instead, see if it's a little smarter with handling all of this? -- Pat On 16/08/2011, at 12:36 PM, subimage wrote: >> Sphinx 1.10 and 2.0.x are fussier about attributes matching, so I'm guessing >> that's why you're only seeing it with 1.10. > > So I should worry about this if I'm upgrading? > >> Are all client_name attributes defined the same way? They're all strings >> using the client association and name column? > > Yes they're all defined in each model the same way. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Thinking Sphinx" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
