Hi Pat - apologies for my even slower response to your response :)
Revisiting this issue now, I'd put it on the back-burner. Nothing
special going on on my side, I am deploying via capistrano so I'm
using a cap task to generate the config.. using shared/config folder
and symlinking to the config from the "current" folder. I've tried
moving the config around, ssh'ing in and generating it manually,
everything I can think of, it just won't generate the index info in
the staging configuration. As though it isn't finding the index
definition in the model.. the config file for staging env looks like
this (its generated using erb from within the cap task to use the
right paths):

staging:
  port: 9312
  enable_star: 1
  min_infix_len: 3
  bin_path: /usr/local/bin
  searchd_file_path: /var/www/rails/appname/shared/db/sphinx
  query_log_file: /var/www/rails/appname/shared/log/searchd.query.log
  config_file: /var/www/rails/appname/shared/config/staging.sphinx.conf
  searchd_log_file: /var/www/rails/appname/shared/log/searchd.log
  pid_file: /var/www/rails/appname/shared/pids/searchd.production.pid

On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Craig
>
> Sorry for the slow response. This is definitely an odd issue - there's 
> nothing in TS that ties things to a hard-coded path... what's in your 
> sphinx.yml file? Are you doing anything particularly different for your 
> staging environment? What's the full command you're running to generate the 
> configuration file?
>
> --
> Pat
>
> On 05/08/2011, at 4:44 AM, Craig wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been hassling with a strange problem for a while now .. in my
>> development environment my config generates perfectly, even if I force
>> it to generate for staging configuration. On the actual staging
>> environment though, no matter what I do, it doesn't seem to pick up
>> the indexes. It generates the configuration without any indexes, only
>> file and connection info.
>>
>> Is there something I'm missing? Is there a sphinx.yml option that
>> gives it the path to force-load models or something?
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.

Reply via email to