I've no idea how that impacts Sphinx - is this something you've taken from the
Sphinx forum or elsewhere?
Could you try this instead?
define_index do
ALLOWED_FOR_GEOBLOCKING.each_slice(32) do |countries|
define_source do
countries.each do |country|
indexes
live_product("geoblock_disabled_for_#{country.downcase}".to_sym),
:as => "geoblock_disabled_for_#{country.downcase}".to_sym
end
end
end
end
Although, now that I look at your search query, wouldn't it be better to have
these fields as attributes instead? Are they boolean values? And that way, you
can probably put them inside a single source/index.
--
Pat
On 05/09/2011, at 10:40 PM, rbjarnason wrote:
> Hi Pat,
>
> I'm changing:
> #define SPH_MAX_FIELDS 32
> to 42 or 64 in sphinx.h in the sphinx-0.9.9/src
>
> Here is how I set up the dynamic geoblocking in the model file:
>
> define_index do
> ...
> ALLOWED_FOR_GEOBLOCKING.each do |country|
> eval "indexes
> live_product.geoblock_disabled_for_#{country.downcase},
> :as=>:geoblock_disabled_for_#{country.downcase}"
> end
> ...
> end
>
> Here is a simplified query:
> @facets = ThinkingSphinx.facets "#{params[:search]} &
> @geoblock_disabled_for_#{@country_code.downcase} 1)", common_options
>
> Thanks for you help.
>
> Best regards,
> Robert
>
> On Sep 2, 12:00 am, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Robert
>>
>> How are you setting SPH_MAX_FIELDS? And what are the search queries you're
>> running?
>>
>> A work-around could be to use multiple sources:
>>
>> define_index do
>> define_source do
>> # ...
>> end
>>
>> define_source do
>> # ...
>> end
>> end
>>
>> You can also use multiple indices in a model - provided you give each index
>> a name:
>>
>> define_index 'foo' do
>> #
>> end
>>
>> Pat
>>
>> On 01/09/2011, at 3:42 AM, rbjarnason wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>
>>> Is there a way to user more than 32 indexes fields with Sphinx 0.9.9?
>>> This is used for a rather complex geoblocking feature where each of
>>> those fields has a string defining all sort of accesses.
>>
>>> I've raised the SPH_MAX_FIELDS parameters to 42, also tried 64 -
>>> everything seems to index smoothly but searches result in no searches.
>>> Are there any limitations in Thinking Sphinx client side for this? I'm
>>> using version 1.3.20.
>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Robert
>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group
>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
