Not sure if this helps, but I have confirmed that the BlankSlate being used in TS is the one from Rails (which is builder-2.1.2 for my version of Rails), instead of the builder-3.0 that is specified ini the gemspec.
On Nov 16, 9:33 am, Ngan <[email protected]> wrote: > Also, I'm on Rails 2.3.2, which I found includes its own version of > builder and therefore BlankSlate. After doing some puts, I found that > the blankslate builded with rails is the one that gets evaluated, and > the one from thinking sphinx gem spec (builder 3.x) is not getting run > at all. > > I'm using bundler. > > On Nov 16, 9:08 am, Ngan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I've added that but then I just get this error: > > Don't know how to reveal method 'instance_eval' > > > Just to confirm: > > > class Builder < BlankSlate > > reveal :instance_eval > > reveal :repond_to? > > > def self.generate(...) > > ... > > end > > > On Nov 16, 2:32 am, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hmm, REE must behave differently with BlankSlate. I've certainly noticed > > > different behaviours for Ruby 1.9 and Rubinius. > > > > Although keep in mind respond_to? is returning the FauxColumn in your > > > example, it's not instance_eval itself. In your local copy of TS, can you > > > add the following to the top of the Builder class: > > > reveal :instance_eval > > > reveal :respond_to? > > > > That'll unhide those methods. > > > > -- > > > Pat > > > > On 16/11/2011, at 2:14 PM, Ngan wrote: > > > > > I've narrowed down the issue... > > > > lib/thinking_sphinx/index/builder.rb > > > > > def initialzie > > > > ... > > > > self.instance_eval &block > > > > ... > > > > end > > > > > That call seems to not be working and/or doing nothing. > > > > When I do: > > > > > puts "self.respond_to?(:instance_eval)", I get: > > > > #<ThinkingSphinx::Index::FauxColumn:0x10f575778> > > > > > I'm on Ruby Enterprise 1.8.7-2010.02 > > > > > This must be because of the BlankSlate/Builder changes? > > > > > On Nov 5, 1:25 am, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I don't suppose the stack trace holds any clues? > > > > >> -- > > > >> Pat > > > > >> On 05/11/2011, at 12:10 AM, Ngan wrote: > > > > >>> I've removed all indexes from all models and left just one: > > > > >>> class Label < ActiveRecord::Base > > > >>> define_index do > > > >>> indexes :name > > > >>> end > > > >>> end > > > > >>> And it still errors. > > > > >>> On Nov 4, 2:36 pm, Ngan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>>> Yea, i downgrade Riddle as well when going to 1.4.9 (it errors when > > > >>>> you don't). > > > > >>>> Will check further > > > > >>>> On Nov 4, 2:07 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>>> Can't think why that error would appear changing from 1.4.7 to > > > >>>>> 1.4.10… > > > > >>>>> When you downgrade to 1.4.9, keep in mind you'll need to downgrade > > > >>>>> Riddle as well (1.5.0 only works with 1.4.10/2.0.10 - all were > > > >>>>> released earlier today). > > > > >>>>> Do any of your index definitions not have any fields? Are you doing > > > >>>>> anything out of the ordinary with index definitions? > > > > >>>>> -- > > > >>>>> Pat > > > > >>>>> On 04/11/2011, at 10:50 PM, Ngan wrote: > > > > >>>>>> I'm on Rails 2.3. Been running TS 1.4.7. Tried to upgrade to to > > > >>>>>> TS > > > >>>>>> 1.4.10, but got this error: > > > > >>>>>> $ rake ts:index --trace > > > >>>>>> ... > > > >>>>>> At least one field is necessary for an index > > > >>>>>> ... > > > > >>>>>> I tried to upgrade to 1.4.9, and got the same error... > > > >>>>>> What changed? > > > > >>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > >>>>>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. > > > >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to > > > >>>>>> [email protected]. > > > >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > >>>>>> [email protected]. > > > >>>>>> For more options, visit this group > > > >>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > > > > >>> -- > > > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > >>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. > > > >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > >>> [email protected]. > > > >>> For more options, visit this group > > > >>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > [email protected]. > > > > For more options, visit this group > > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
