Hi Stan

Is there any chance you could create a basic test app that reproduces the 
issue? I can't see any reason why the behaviour would be different, and it's a 
bit hard to debug any further without access to either your app or a test app 
that has the same problem.

With regards to gem versions, you can't use anything that's 2.x or 3.x - so, 
the latest that's friendly for Rails 2.3 is 1.5.0.

-- 
Pat

On 12/10/2013, at 3:41 AM, Stan Shore <[email protected]> wrote:

> I wanted to give you a little more info.  I recreated this archived table on 
> my test server (I was originally working on my development machine) and 
> encountered the same results!  The Thinking Sphinx version was the same, the 
> Sphinx version was different (2.0.9 on my dev machine, 0.9.9 on the test 
> server).  I don't know that this info helps, but I just wanted you to know.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Stan
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Stan Shore <[email protected]> wrote:
> It doesn't get any simpler.  The index definitions are identical:
> 
>   define_index do
>     indexes :first_name, :sortable => true
>     indexes :last_name, :sortable => true
>     indexes :message
> 
>     has created_at
>     has dist90038
> 
>     where "type in 
> ('ContactShow','DoctorContact','ProcedureRequest','TellUs')"
> 
>   end
> 
> By the way, I tried removing the has statements and the where statement and 
> reconfiguring and reindexing with the same results.  Even if I try the 
> simplest search:
> 
> ContactInfo.search('worried')
> ContactArchive.search('worried')
> 
> The first one works, the second one doesn't.
> 
> Seems crazy but there it is.
> 
> I'm wondering about versions.  What gem version for Thinking Sphinx and 
> Riddle should I be using for Rails 2.3.15?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Stan
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can you show us the index definitions for both models, and the queries you're 
> running?
> 
> On 09/10/2013, at 4:28 AM, stasch <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> I've got two tables in the same database that are identical in structure - 
>> columns, indexes, permissions (one is an archive of the other).  The model 
>> files are not identical but the associations and index declarations are.  
>> The archive model contains a subset of the functionality of the original, 
>> but I have already gone so far as to reduce the model file for the archive 
>> to just the associations and index declarations.  When I rebuild the indexes 
>> after deleting all files in the index directory both models are  processed 
>> without complaint.  The index files are created with identical permissions.  
>> But when I do a simple search (for the word 'worried') on each the original 
>> file returns many results, the archive file returns no results.  When I use 
>> the error method to check for errors on the result set it returns nil.  When 
>> I look in the query log it shows that the query was successfully executed 
>> and returned 0 results.  But when I do a sql query on the indexed field in 
>> the archive file it returns over 3000 results (select count(*) from 
>> contact_archive where message like '% worried %').
>> 
>> My environment is Ruby 1.8.7, Rails 2.3.15 and Thinking Sphinx 1.4.10.  Any 
>> help would be greatly appreciated.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/thinking-sphinx/tVmRxNDkM3M/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to