Sphinx is ideal for finding records based on clear search terms... but the harder part of what you're doing is figuring out what the search terms are (well, something *like* that), so yes, I don't think Sphinx is the best tool for the job. I don't think you need a search engine, perhaps just some code that splits some text up into keywords and key phrases, and find matching tags.
-- Pat On 20/10/2013, at 6:36 AM, Max NudePatch <[email protected]> wrote: > Look at the screenshot. Its explaining everything. > > I have very large amount of tags. > And I need to auto assign\suggest tags for text. > Text for example: > "This is great movie to watch." > So I want to auto assign "movie" tag to this text. > > If I have only 10-20 tags its ok to index this text and search for every tag. > I will get very intelligent association with stemming and morphology, even if > tag name is "great watch". > Second solution I found is search in tags by every word from text. But I will > get poor quality of suggestion. > I will get "good movie", "bad movie" with "movie" search. > > I read near topic, looks like he wants something similar. > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=ru#!topic/thinking-sphinx/XxZcT-lUMd8 > So it seems sphinx can't help me with it. > > пятница, 18 октября 2013 г., 18:29:41 UTC+6 пользователь Walter Davis написал: > > On Oct 18, 2013, at 1:54 AM, Max NudePatch wrote: > > > Greetings. > > I have a big amount of tags. Users can post messages with tags > > associations. > > Its ok to associate these tags by hand. But what if i have more than 5000 > > keywords? > > It becomes nightmare. Is there any solution to parse text and retrieve tags > > automatically? > > > > Google Answers did this trick before. But it is available only in certain > > countries. > > So here is the screenshot of what i need. > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/it2ok7lelahed4o/windows%20ask.png > > > > Have you looked at a solution such as acts_as_taggable or any of its newer > kin? I'm not sure that Sphinx is the issue here. If you're looking to > restrict the tags, or try to get the users to gravitate toward a popular set > of keywords, that seems to me to be a separate issue than searching by them > later, right? > > Walter > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Thinking Sphinx" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
