Hi Walter, This isn’t currently possible, though certainly it wouldn’t be hard to add that capability in, as you’ve noted. Right now I’m on the fence about whether I’d accept such a patch though - I like the idea of having one clear interface for such things (though I know I’ve not always followed that approach in the past!), and the only benefit I can think of at the moment is saving a few characters.
Are there other reasons around why this feature would be useful? Cheers, — Pat > On 17 Mar 2019, at 6:34 am, Walter Lee Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > > Would it be possible to allow the scope method in real time indexing to > accept the name of a scope on the indexed model? I'd like to be able to use > > scope :published > > rather than > > scope { Speech.published } > > I got an error indicating that scope expects a block (1 variable rather than > 0 passed) so it occurs to me that it may be possible to wrap the current > behavior in if block_given? and then drop back to > > the_inferred_model.call scope_argument > > or [whatever actually works with models and scopes and isn't `send`] > > Any thoughts about this? > > Thanks, > > Walter > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Thinking Sphinx" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
