Hi Walter, I can’t think of a better way to do this off the top of my head - I’m presuming there’s no special scope provided by Ancestry that allows access to all records (as I understand it, that’s what you’re after?) that can be used by find_in_batches?
— Pat > On 17 Mar 2019, at 6:30 am, Walter Lee Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've got a combination of TS (latest) and Ancestry in play, and I'm just now > trying to move from SQL indices to real_time. I was able to make a tortured > bit of Ruby to collect all the IDs and then return them in a single > association that TS could find_in_batches over, but I am wondering if there > is a way to do this that I will not have to stare at so long in a few months, > when I've forgotten why it works: > > scope { Document.where(id: Document.publicly.map{ |d| > [d.id].concat(d.descendant_ids) }.flatten) } > > publicly is a scope that gives me only the "roots" of the ancestry tree with > a combination of a particular set of slugs and the "published" flag, and then > I'm appending descendent_ids and making a new collection from the lot of them > with the outer "find". > > Any suggestions? > > Thanks in advance, > > Walter > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Thinking Sphinx" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
