I was surprised to find the other day that apparently
I have a SATA controller on my Thinkpad T43 model 2668-8AG.

According to lspci (under Linux):
00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801FBM (ICH6M)
        SATA Controller (rev 03)

Could I really put a SATA drive in this machine?
If so, would the usual restriction apply?
(I mean, the annoying but not disabling message
that tells me the drive in use is not on the approved list.)

I have 3 T43's (or 4, if one dead one is included),
and this is the first one that says it has a SATA controller.


The T43 series is a royal pain.  It has a chipset with SATA but
for some reason IBM/Lenovo decided to use a SATA-PATA
bridge and PATA devices.  This is why there are restrictions
on hard drives in the later BIOS revisions, etc.  My guess is
they decided to certify certain PATA drives as working correctly
with the translation done in the bridge and they didn't wish to
deal with drives that didn't work quite correctly.

I have a T43p - I managed to get one of the 100 GB 7200
RPM drives that has the "good" bios and it still works (knock
on wood :-) )

Stuart

OT - I have had experience with various drives that didn't
work correctly.  The firmware in the drives had problems.
For example, an extremely expensive SCSI drive ($3000
many years ago) would not work correctly as a boot drive
in a high end Sun workstation but would work OK as a
data drive.  Sun hadn't certified the drive and the firmware
wasn't correct.  Various other drives (again SCSI) didn't
correctly do command queueing - you could turn that off
in the controller setup but it killed performance as a server.
Sun burned new firmware into those Seagate and IBM
drives and that would fix the errors (you also got to pay
for it if you purchased the "good" drives from Sun - they
cost about double).
_______________________________________________
Thinkpad mailing list
[email protected]
http://stderr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/thinkpad

Reply via email to