One other thing that I forgot to mention is that I would be in favor
of adding a new message type for asynchronous calls, even though
it would changing the wire format and could be kind of a pain to roll
out.
This would give the flexility to the client to decide which functions
should be invoked in a one-way manner at runtime, instead of deciding at
function definition time in the IDL, right? Then the async/oneway keyword
can be dropped.
Would this be acceptable for everyone if the server has no control over
which functions are invoked in a one-way manner? If not, the information
about being one-way or not must still be recorded in the IDL and must be
available to the server so it can enforce the one-way policy.
--
Kind regards,
Johan Stuyts
