FWIW, Joe is an ASF member, and has an ICLA on file, therefore the Jira check box is not required, you can accept patches for him via whatever means is easiest.
Upayavira On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 17:05 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote: > ----- Original Message ---- > > > From: Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2009 8:01:15 PM > > Subject: Re: PATCH for LICENSE and NOTICE files > > > > On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Chad Walters wrote: > > > > > Doesn't everything in the codebase get the Apache license? > > > > > > > Third-party dependencies can be non-Apache-license as long as they're > > compatible: > > > > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html > > > > It looks like LGPL is *not* allowed - we should probably look at the > > OCamlMakefile and setup.rb files to see if we need to rewrite them "from > > scratch" - my guess is someone just cped existing ones as templates and > > already rewrote them for Thrift's use case > > I wouldn't worry too much about what the policy says regarding the LGPL > in this circumstance. All the LGPL files appear to be build related, > not the actual thrift software. LGPL as a build dependency is something > I'm sure we could ask for permission to use if we need to. > > >
