OK, then I'm going to set the feature freeze date at Thursday 8/12. If it hasn't been committed by then, it won't be in 0.4. Please evaluate which of your favorite issues should be completed by then.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Agreed. May as well turn the crank again and see if it is smoother this > time... > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 15:54, Mark Slee <ms...@facebook.com> wrote: > > I'll defer to you on this. Agreed 0.3 took longer than expected, but it > seemed like a lot of the issues are things less likely to be repeated (i.e. > licensing details, etc.). Also, the less time we wait between releases, the > fewer things there will be to go awry, so frequency and ease-of-release > should be correlated. > > > > I'm also not sure how much of your time this took up -- seems like the > work is pretty intermittent waiting between votes, but appreciate the fact > that this isn't your full-time job and you have other stuff keeping you > busy. > > > > Since there have already been a few emails with folks mentioning patches > they'd like to see released, it seems like there is sufficient demand for > another go-around. So, whenever the mood strikes you, I'd support starting > things up. > > > > Cheers, > > mcslee > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bryan Duxbury [mailto:br...@rapleaf.com] > > Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 11:54 AM > > To: thrift-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Thrift 0.4? > > > > All - > > > > 0.3 took an awful long time to get out, and a lot of stuff has gone into > 0.4 > > already. When do you think we should start trying to get 0.4 released? I > > could imagine starting immediately or waiting a month. > > > > -Bryan > > >
