I'm going to -1 this tarball myself due to issues with the PHP extension
building. I'll post another RC momentarily.

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Anthony Molinaro <
antho...@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:

> Yeah, actually they pass for me as well in Mac with only 256.  So I'm
> thinking
> it could somehow be vmware, or maybe I have some bad network config, do
> the tests open a lot of sockets?
>
> The java versions are almost identical
>
> CentOS
> % java -version
> java version "1.6.0_20"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_20-b02)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 16.3-b01, mixed mode)
>
> MacOSX
> % java -version
> java version "1.6.0_20"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_20-b02-279-10M3065)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 16.3-b01-279, mixed mode)
>
> So I'm thinking it must either be some sort of networking configuration,
> or some sort of vmware specific problem.
>
> Either way, looks like it might be an environment not a software problem.
>
> -Anthony
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 07:20:21AM -0700, Bryan Duxbury wrote:
> > The Java unit tests *do* run in a single VM, so there is a chance that if
> > things are leaked you could have later tests contaminated. I made this
> > change to the test suite so that the tests would execute very quickly.
> >
> > By all signs, the ulimit on my Mac is 256, but my tests pass.
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Anthony Molinaro <
> > antho...@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > Okay, so I got it to pass the tests.  I started playing with the number
> > > of threads in the async test since that was the first that failed, and
> > > that works, but seemed odd.  100 works fine, 400 works fine, 490 causes
> > > a test several past the async test to fail.
> > >
> > > This makes me think somehow junit is running everything in the same
> > > java vm, and it's somehow leaking some file descriptors with my version
> > > of java (or maybe in thrift lib, hard to say).
> > >
> > > Since the problem was open file descriptors, I checked and my ulimit
> > > was 1024, so with 500 threads in the async test, if for some reason
> > > some of the tests open a bunch of network connections or something,
> > > and fail to close them you could run out of file descriptors and things
> > > would start failing.
> > >
> > > So I upped my limit to 65535 and now the tests pass.  So not sure if
> > > this warrants a ticket or not, it could be an issue with file
> descriptors
> > > leaking somewhere, it could maybe be a problem with the version of
> > > java I'm running (although we've been running cassandra and our own
> > > high throughput, high traffic webserver with it, without issue,
> although
> > > not on vmware which is the 'machine' I'm running on).
> > >
> > > Bryan, what is your file descriptor limit set to?
> > >
> > > Anyway, still want a ticket?
> > >
> > > -Anthony
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 02:19:14PM -0700, Bryan Duxbury wrote:
> > > > On my local machine, the java library tests cleanly. The errors in
> your
> > > > build output seem to be related to available file handles, which
> should
> > > > never be an issue. I'm not sure this is a real bug or not, but could
> you
> > > > please open a ticket for us to investigate?
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Anthony Molinaro <
> > > > antho...@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > -1 from me, make check fails on Centos 5.3 because of java failures
> > > > >
> > > > > % java -version
> > > > > java version "1.6.0_20"
> > > > > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_20-b02)
> > > > > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 16.3-b01, mixed mode)
> > > > >
> > > > > Build/check output attached
> > > > >
> > > > > -Anthony
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > Anthony Molinaro                           <
> > > antho...@alumni.caltech.edu>
> > > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Anthony Molinaro                           <
> antho...@alumni.caltech.edu>
> > >
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Anthony Molinaro                           <antho...@alumni.caltech.edu>
>

Reply via email to